Hi Configuration looks good. I do not see any problem with this setup. ... View more

Hi I guess stsickiness is answer to your problem. Try static source base stickiness and point individual subnet to specific proxy. ... View more

Hi, What i know is wave-294 support 8 GB RAM but only option is 4*2GB and not 2*4GB. check this link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/waas/wave/installation/294/guide/294op2.html#wp1057636 please sare the part code of 4 gb ram you are using. ... View more

Hi, problem is in you config, both class are pointing to same VIP and PORT, so first class will be only HIT. try this confgiuration policy-map type loadbalance first-match NON_AUTHENT_PM   class NON_AUTHENT_CM   --------for desired client source IP's     serverfarm PROXY_HTTP_SF     nat dynamic 6 vlan 1601 serverfarm primary   class class-default    ------for rest of client IP's     serverfarm PROXY_HTTP_SF     nat dynamic 5 vlan 1601 serverfarm primary and remove NAT from multi-match policy. use single class, so rest of config will be serverfarm host PROXY_HTTP_SF   description Proxied Internet Connections   probe PROXY_HTTP_PROBE   fail-on-all   rserver ELFCPRXY1     inservice   rserver ELFCPRXY2     inservice   rserver ELFCPRXY3     inservice class-map match-any NONAUTHENT_HTTP_VIP   3 match virtual-address 10.10.240.5 tcp eq 80 class-map type http loadbalance match-any NON_AUTHENT_CM   description Subnets from which Internet Authentication is not Required   3 match source-address 10.10.16.0 255.255.240.0   4 match source-address 10.10.32.0 255.255.240.0   5 match source-address 10.10.48.0 255.255.240.0 policy-map type loadbalance first-match NON_AUTHENT_PM   class NON_AUTHENT_CM     serverfarm PROXY_HTTP_SF     nat dynamic 6 vlan 1601 serverfarm primary   class class-default     serverfarm PROXY_HTTP_SF     nat dynamic 5 vlan 1601 serverfarm primary policy-map multi-match LOAD_BAL   class NONAUTHENT_HTTP_VIP     loadbalance vip inservice     loadbalance policy NON_AUTHENT_PM     loadbalance vip icmp-reply Hope this help ... View more

Hi You need to add some more detail of your toplogy. but what i assuming is that all four servers [HTTP and FTP] are in same subnet, thats why when HTTP rserver hit FTP VIP reply from FTP will hit directly. If this is the case, you have to configured NAT on this server side VLAN interface. ... View more

pls check whether what is the status of LED's on front panel. if LED status is normal as per http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/waas/wave/installation/294/guide/294intr.html#wp1062977 you can alos check bmc logs for any temp issue sh bmc event-log all if things are good and it seems to be false alarm then it could be CSCty10733 workaround to clear the alarm. clear bmc event-log reload ... View more

HI Vijay, Few things i want to share from your output, the reason of this  assignemnt you are seeing is because your WAE 10.240.163.146 which has "out of order" assignement, is added later [see there connect time] So we can conlcude that intially you have only 2 wae's in your setup [or may be 3] and have linier bucket assignemt but after addition of third one [or reload of 3rd one] bucket got re-assigned to this 3rd WAE from other two. in short this was your assignment befor addition of 3rd WAE, wae2: 1-31 buckets wae3: 32-63 buckets when 3rd WAE added, half of buckets from each WAE got assigned. and result is what you are seeing. Hope this explanation anserrwd your query. ... View more