Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Jared Oliver
Stats
Member since
07-31-2013
15
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
in Small Business Routers
10-12-2015
03:09 PM
10-12-2015
03:09 PM
I will say the Cisco 881 aren't very expensive and give fantastic uptime. Have a look at Huawei AR160 if you get a chance. Very similar to 881, but with greater performance and multiple WAN options for fail-over i.e. Fibre, VDSL and 4G.
... View more
10-11-2015
04:37 PM
Hi R0man, Sort of - I threw the device away. I instead went with a couple of Cisco 881. There was a steep learning curve, but it was very rewarding. I used this website to help build a base configuration - http://www.ifm.net.nz/cookbooks/800-isr-wizard.html Unfortunately, the 800 series is a bit under-powered - as soon as the WAN link went above 30mbps up and down it started freeze every so often. We're now looking at another compatible manufacturer. Tests are very positive. I can tell you more if you're interested. Regards, Jared
... View more
04-20-2015
01:34 PM
Hi, I often get this message in my logs; %COMMON_FIB-6-FIB_RECURSION: has too many (8) levels of recursion during process switch Does anyone have any idea what this means? This same router has, on average, one disconnect from our GRE tunnel each day and I can't connect to it externally until the cable modem is rebooted. The log above is the only thing I've got to go on really. Everything else looks normal. Thanks!
... View more
Labels:
01-18-2015
12:31 PM
Just so you guys know, the conflicting information is from a guy with 25+ years experience who claims he's a networking expert. He said they definitely were forwarded and that threw me off. I've now tested it and have verified that these packets are not forwarded by default through a GRE tunnel. Thanks guys :)
... View more
01-15-2015
11:52 AM
Hi, I have a GRE tunnel setup between two sites. An application is setup at each site that makes use of 255.255.255.255 UDP broadcasts to help make setup easier. Technically, these broadcast packets are not supposed to be forwarded through routers. However, I have been receiving conflicting information about this. Will these packets be blocked or forwarded by default? If these packets are forwarded, is there a way to block them? Should I look to block the ports these broadcasts are on anyway with some sort of ACL? Thanks, Phatduny
... View more
Labels:
11-05-2014
11:21 PM
Only took three days too. It's funny how writing things out on a forum helps you work it all out.
... View more
11-05-2014
06:21 PM
Connecting a computer to one of the FastEthernet ports fixed my issue. I love and loathe you Cisco.
... View more
11-05-2014
03:21 PM
I haven't got a device plugged in to the LAN interfaces at site B. I notice that VLAN1 status and protocol are down. Could this be the issue? Is it down because nothing is plugged into a LAN port? SITE B:show ip int brief Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol FastEthernet0 unassigned YES unset down down FastEthernet1 unassigned YES unset down down FastEthernet2 unassigned YES unset down down FastEthernet3 unassigned YES unset down down FastEthernet4 (SITE B PUBLIC IP) YES NVRAM up up NVI0 (SITE B PUBLIC IP) YES unset up up Tunnel1 10.0.64.254 YES NVRAM up up Vlan1 192.168.64.254 YES NVRAM down down
... View more
11-05-2014
02:27 PM
Thought I'd add some pings and traceroutes SITE B:ping 192.168.1.254 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.254, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 24/26/28 ms SITE B:traceroute 192.168.1.254 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 192.168.1.254 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 10.0.64.1 28 msec * 28 msec SITE B: traceroute 192.168.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 192.168.1.1 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 10.0.64.1 28 msec 24 msec 32 msec 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 SITE A:ping 192.168.64.254 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.64.254, timeout is 2 seconds: ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) SITE A: traceroute 192.168.64.254 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 192.168.64.254 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 10.0.64.254 28 msec 28 msec 24 msec 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 * * *
... View more
11-05-2014
02:21 PM
Hi Everyone, I've setup GRE over IPSec between 881 and 887VAs with no problem. I'm now trying to setup one between two 881s. The configuration was working when SITE B was setup behind a router. FastEthernet4 is now connected directly to a public ip address as it's connected to a new cable connection. The tunnels are up. I can ping both tunnels, but I can't get a ping back on the remote LAN. Only Site B can initialise the tunnel with interesting traffic. Site B router can ping Site A router, but no other devices on Site A's LAN. Site A can't ping Site B's router. Both routers can ping tunnel interfaces (10.0.64.1 and 10.0.64.254). SITE A: Local LAN: 192.168.1.254/255.255.255.0 Tunnel64: 10.0.64.1/255.255.255.0 interface Tunnel64 description testing tunnel ip address 10.0.64.1 255.255.255.0 ip mtu 1352 ip tcp adjust-mss 1312 tunnel source FastEthernet4 tunnel destination (SITE B Public IP) tunnel path-mtu-discovery tunnel protection ipsec profile (VPN-PROFILE) ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 (ROUTER IP ADDRESS) ip route 192.168.64.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.64.254 SITE B: Local LAN: 192.168.64.254/255.255.255.0 Tunnel1: 10.0.64.254/255.255.255.0 interface Tunnel1 ip address 10.0.64.254 255.255.255.0 ip mtu 1352 ip tcp adjust-mss 1312 tunnel source FastEthernet4 tunnel destination (SITE A Public IP) tunnel path-mtu-discovery tunnel protection ipsec profile (VPN PROFILE) ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 (PUBLIC IP GATEWAY) ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.64.1 Any help would be appreciated :) I'm pretty stumped :(
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
in Small Business Routers
08-01-2013
04:43 PM
08-01-2013
04:43 PM
That's cool. I notice the full and split tunneling features on the RV220W are for SSL VPN. Does this apply for IPSec VPN also?
... View more
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
in Small Business Routers
08-01-2013
02:53 PM
08-01-2013
02:53 PM
Thanks Vijay. That makes sense. Would you happen to know of any small business routers that do support full tunnelling? Say the RV220W? Is there an easy way to tell? Sent from my keyboard
... View more
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
in Small Business Routers
07-31-2013
09:02 PM
07-31-2013
09:02 PM
If I were using a Fortigate I would setup a route for 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 to go through the VPN interface. Is there something similar available for this router?
... View more
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
in Small Business Routers
07-31-2013
07:45 PM
07-31-2013
07:45 PM
Hello, I've setup my RV180 to VPN to our head office Fortigate 60C. It works really well My only problem is that I'm not sure how to make internet traffic at our remote site go through to head office. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I can clearly see that any traffic destined for our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site. My fortigate way of thinking said that I need a static route to forward all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I have read elsewhere that I need to setup some sort of ACL. Does anyone else have any ideas on this/has anyone successfully set up somehting similar?
... View more
Labels:
10-12-2015
I will say the Cisco 881 aren't very expensive and give fantastic
uptime.Have a look at Huawei AR160...
10-11-2015
Hi R0man,Sort of - I threw the device away. I instead went with a couple
of Cisco 881. There was a s...
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Routing
04-20-2015
04-20-2015
Hi,I often get this message in my logs;%COMMON_FIB-6-FIB_RECURSION: has
too many (8) levels of recur...
01-18-2015
Just so you guys know, the conflicting information is from a guy with
25+ years experience who claim...
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Routing
01-15-2015
01-15-2015
Hi, I have a GRE tunnel setup between two sites. An application is setup
at each site that makes use...
11-05-2014
Only took three days too. It's funny how writing things out on a forum
helps you work it all out.
11-05-2014
Connecting a computer to one of the FastEthernet ports fixed my issue. I
love and loathe you Cisco.
11-05-2014
I haven't got a device plugged in to the LAN interfaces at site B. I
notice that VLAN1 status and pr...
11-05-2014
Thought I'd add some pings and traceroutesSITE B:ping 192.168.1.254Type
escape sequence to abort.Sen...
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Routing
11-05-2014
11-05-2014
Hi Everyone, I've setup GRE over IPSec between 881 and 887VAs with no
problem. I'm now trying to set...
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
08-01-2013
08-01-2013
That's cool. I notice the full and split tunneling features on the
RV220W are for SSL VPN. Does this...
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
08-01-2013
08-01-2013
Thanks Vijay. That makes sense. Would you happen to know of any small
business routers that do suppo...
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
07-31-2013
07-31-2013
If I were using a Fortigate I would setup a route for 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 to
go through the VPN interfac...
Created by
Jared Oliver
in Small Business Routers
07-31-2013
07-31-2013
Hello,I've setup my RV180 to VPN to our head office Fortigate 60C. It
works really well My only prob...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 07-31-2013 07:31 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 07-27-2018 12:07 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 15 |
