Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Perhaps this discussion is not in right topic, but it contain some Cisco equipment and I am trying to understand problem.so my apologies if I am on wrong place, but I know that are people with the best networking knowledge are here.
Short:My ISP GW d...
Hi, I have some misunderstanding with ACL using service-object and port-object.Device is Cisco ASA ASA5510 Software Version 8.2(5).1 ACL using service-objectaccess-list PAT-all extended permit object-group Site-LAN-serObj-tcp object-group Site-LAN an...
Hi,Could anyone explain me this lines in ACL:... permit tcp 10.10.1.0 0.0.0.255 any range 22 telnet permit tcp 10.30.1.0 0.0.0.255 any range 22 telnet permit tcp 10.30.2.0 0.0.0.255 any range 22 telnet deny ip any any log ...line vty 0 4 access-cl...
Hello,does anybody can tell me (explain) how I can see on my Cisco ASA who (from my local network - using cisco anyconnect) are trying access to an outside VPN (not my VPN)?What kind of traffic should I look on my ASA? Thanks.
Hello,Scenario:I have C2960X- 48 gigabit Ethernet ports.At the other end are computers. Problem - Question:The computer is turned off (not on standby),But status of port is up ...GigabitEthernet1/0/10 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Encapsulat...
Thank you John.
I've got from my ISP Cisco EPC3925 Voice GW and there is no option to add static routes to my VLANs, so I put router (openwrt) between GW and Catalyst 3560, because of routing.
Yes I can change VLAN10 network address, but 192.168.0.0...
I think that I found mistake in the first ACL,
access-list PAT-all line 7 extended permit tcp 10.55.0.0 255.255.0.0 any neq smtp
This line open all tcp ports including 82, (except smtp)?
It was used on ASA FW, for inside lan, to permit inside hosts to reach outside networks.
I have tried with ACL using service-object to define ports that are allowed:- as you can see syntax is somehow different than usualacl acl-name object-group serv...
I didn't use both ACLs at the same time, it is just copy.
ACL with service-object was used first. I found that use of this ACL is wrong.
So, I am looking to figure out why first ACL is wrong?
