Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
i am trying to do a migration for a customer.the following commands has changed on the interface level, can anyhow help me with the conversion?
srr-queue bandwidth share 1 30 1 70priority-queue out mls qos vlan-based
seems like it has changed the com...
i am doing a migration with max-reserved-bandwidth set at interface level.
understand that the command is deprecated and is replaced using class/policy map/bandwidth percent.
however the existing interface already has a policy-map being applied.
how...
ic ok.. so to conclude.. I can do my usual marking on the access ports.. apply the policy map output that has been discussed.. remove auto qos trust in those trunk ports.. by default it should automatically be trusted.. and apply the same policy map ...
sorry i don't really understand your statement.
1) so all downlink egress interfaces must have same queues-types or same service policy? how would the switch know if it's a up or downlink? i can have access port for uplink as well.
2) uplink egress ...
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11910836/3850-and-qos-implementation
I found this above, but i don't really understand and not sure how can i tweet to make it work on my case.
seems like i may need to create a policy-map with the exact cl...
i got the following error, what does it means?
*Aug 24 18:25:58.584 JST: Order of classes in policy name TEST is not consistent with installed policy*Aug 24 18:25:58.584 JST: %QOS-6-POLICY_INST_FAILED: Service policy installation failed
found some weird behavior..
this is the default commands generally from auto qos
!class-map match-any AutoQos-4.0-Output-Multimedia-Conf-Queue match dscp af41 af42 af43 match cos 4 class-map match-any AutoQos-4.0-Output-Bulk-Data-Queue match dscp a...