Hi everybody,I was wondering if cisco supports trafic engineering with rsvp over cell mode mpls.So far the only reference from the cco related to this is the feature "mpls diff-serv aware traffic engineering over atm" in 12.2(8) release.I know that ...
Hi,Is there a clear answer about mpls traffic engineering support in cell mode (BPX ATM core) networks with rsvp in order to correctly signal premiumversus standard traffic etc.The current multi vc implementation treats all LSPtraffic as low priorit...
Hi,Any idea if cell (idle) suppresion is supported on MGX 8850 CESM T1/E1 and CESM T3/E3 cards when using unstructured data transport.If yes how do i enable itThanksKostas
Hi, I have a case where my MPLS_PE (edge LSR) router is connected on a BPX switch (core LSR) via an STM-1 link.What if all or one of the tag vc's on this link fills with (ubr PCR:155Mb)traffic?I have used a second STM-1 link from the PE to the BPX a...
Although a bit irrelevant to the discussion ,an important issue to keep in mind at least with BPX,is that you cannot control over which BPX trunk(if more than one)the LVCs will get nailed.This happens when all trunks are controled by a single partiti...
May i ask if you are refering to the "mp-ebgp for vpnv4" solution where labels are exchanged by peering two ASBR's directly?Is this where you don't have "tagging operational" on the ASBR-ASBR linkwhen the interface is up/up? In regards to "neighbor x...
Hi JeffreyFrom the implementation point of view the router enables the switching of taged packets on the "inter-AS interface" as soon as you activate the address family for the mp-ebgp peering. You can do a show tag-switch interface x detail to see...
Hi Jeffrey,All the information the ASBRx need in order to forward a packetto the neighbor AS is a next hop information and a label to reach the neighborAS vpnv4 prefix.-Next hop info is provided via direct mp-ebgp,like in "plain e-bgp"(not multihop,...
