Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi, is it possible to establish RSVP-TE tunnel destined to secondary (not primary) loopback address? I have configured 172.17.10.102 as secondary loopback on some ASR. Now, when I try to establish RSVP-TE tunnel to that address from other node, it fa...
Hi, I have very simple test lab, where PE1 is directly connected to PE2. On PE2 I have RSVP-TE tunnel to PE1: RP/0/0/CPU0:01-PE2#show running-config interface tunnel-te11 inheritanceFri Feb 6 08:03:13.907 UTCinterface tunnel-te11 ipv4 unnumbered Loo...
Hi, I have simple configuration where I conditionally generate aggregate route based on some route-policy: router bgp 65001 vrf TEST-A rd 172.16.10.102:103 address-family ipv4 unicast aggregate-address 0.0.0.0/0 route-policy RP-TESTwhen I display...
Hi,During testing, I try following policy:route-policy PL-BGP-DOWN-VPN-TEST if destination in (0.0.0.0/0) then if protocol is static then done endif endif dropend-policy!After applying that policy to VPNv4 BGP neighbor, I get following ...
Problem is not with the routing, since as visible from my initial post RSVP-TE Path message arrives to the ASR in question. The problem is that IOS XR accepts Path messages requesting RSVP-TE tunnels destined to TE Router ID. Since in my case TE Rout...
OK. It was my fault (misconfiguration). On CE I had VRF-lite, and the loopback with address in question (192.168.2.5) was not in that VRF. Now is working :-). Thanks
I have similar problem. Did you manage to resolve the BGP-LU prefixes received over eBGP session? In my case as well all looks OK (eBGP LU session up, prefixes with labels exchanged, routing table looks OK), with the exception of CEF: RP/0/0/CPU0:02-...
