Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I'm just learning the new Cisco EWC lingo on a Cisco 9120AX. Got over the initial shock of Policies and Tags and think I have a good handle on it. But my situation now is that my WLAN configured for vlan 1 will not drop the client on vlan 1, but dr...
Can we use R-type antennas on a N-connector AP - and vice versa?
Using the appropriate R-N adapters to physically connect the two, is this acceptable?
If acceptable, what is the impact on signal strength and coverage?
Hi again rrudling, the image you shared is showing the WLAN ID number, not the Vlan id. The VLANs are assigned under the Policy Profile (see attached images). I figured out if you want to use names, you must update or create a Flex profile. Hence ...
Thanks rrudling, but I tried that - just using vlan numbers. In my example it worked for vlan 5 and 52, but not for 1. It only worked if I used a named vlan, and one that did not use the number 1 at the end of it.
Thanks Hayden, I was just about to try something like that when I saw your reply. I was frustrated because I created a VLAN under the default-flex-profile named VLAN001 and assigned it vlan1, then modified the policy profile using VLAN001 - no change...
Thanks for the reply Arshadsaf. I agree that we shouldn't be using vlan1 for clients, but we are trying to avoid making significant changes to their existing environment. Remember that I'm using a Cisco 9120AX EWC and not a Cisco 9800 WLC (that's com...
