Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have a Cisco 3600 and Cradlepoint R1900 running OSPF just fine between themselves (for when there's an internal connection). I have the Cradlepoint creating a VTI Ikev2 ipsec tunnel to a Cisco ASA5516-X and the tunnel is fine, at least I can ping e...
I have a double problem, and could really use someone with a 5516 that can check the space available.Problem #1 is that we keep running out of disk space and cannot figure out why. There is a known issue with buildup of files in /log but we are dele...
I just started working on a new client who has two 5506x and a 5516x. Setting up network monitoring I have generally used a "logging history list-name" statement to filter what SNMP traps are sent. I put this into these, and two rejected it, one acc...
I'm less than a novice at BGP, and helping a client. They have two sites in separate counties that have both redundant equipment and paths between them. Each site connects, separately, to an AT&T state run network that is semi-private (meaning it h...
I have read older postings saying this is not supported, but there are hints that it may be in later versions. I have (for example) a 3850 running 16.12.07.ciscoIetfDhcpv4SrvMIBObjects ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.10.102.1) appears to have some of the data, incl...
I wanted to put some closure to this. I've had an S2 ticket open all this time. Cisco was (after weeks) able to reproduce the problem, and forwarded it to engineering. Engineering was... well, it's not completely clear whether they reproduced it o...
(a) I'm not sure how that matters for this (but am curious), but (b) yes, it was already present. I really am starting to think that 9.16 just plain doesn't support this despite it picking up the vti interface as an ospf interface. I've been looking...
Let me add one more clue -- I did a trace on the packets captured that appear to be from the cradlepoint as multicast hellos. They are (maybe) being dropped as follows: 1: 10:33:28.056469 172.18.4.1 > 224.0.0.5 ip-proto-89, length 44
Phase...
So thanks @KeHan and @paul driver Everything I read says that the VTI tunnels should pass routing protocols, though I have yet to see anything definitive if it can do so with broadcast protocols or needs unicast. They do work with broadcast on non-A...