Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Good day. I meet an issue with ASR 903 (RSP3) that I don't understand.
cisco ASR-903 (RSP3_400) processor
Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 03.18.02.SP.156-2.SP2-ext
I have an ethernet interface (A900-IMA8S1Z, cooper gigabit SFP) with configuration:
in...
Good day. I have a question.
cisco ASR-903 (RSP3_400) processor (revision RSP3_400)
Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 03.18.01.S - Extended Support ReleaseCisco IOS Software, ASR900 Software (PPC_LINUX_IOSD-UNIVERSALK9_NPE-M), Version 15.6(2)S1, RELEASE...
Hello. I need some assistance. Sorry about my english, not a native speaker.
We have a router (ASR903). To one of VRFs configured on it I want to apply export map. Something like this:
vrf definition VRF1 rd 65000:101 route-target export 65000:101 ro...
Hello everyone!
I have a question. When I configuring this NAT rule (ASA 5545-X, IOS 9.2(4)): (masked public IPv4 addresses)
nat (inside,outside) source dynamic kspd-nets_inside granit-out-nat-host destination static granit-out-nets_outside granit-o...
//Excuse me for my English in advance
Greetings everyone! Need assistance. I can't get work logic of ASA's routing decision process (IOS - 9.2(4)). NAT rules override routing table they said. But that's what I get:
I have ASA, let's say, with 2 inter...
Thank you for fresh sight. I will research this approach. But it seems there is only one associated physical interface with this service instance.
CR903#show ethernet service instance id 1 interface gigabitEthernet 0/2/6 detail
Service Instance ID: ...
Unfortunately I can't reload this device, some kind of production scheme. But I should note, after 300 seconds mac-address was aged out. But why had not it been deleted when physical interface link turned down.
It's correct. But corresponding physical interface for that EFP is down. Can I somehow track state of physical interface and clear mac-addresses on that EFP if interface is down?
If someone is curious. I opened a Cisco TAC case. There is bug/feature. "Continue" statement isn't supported in VRF export/import route-maps. For now at least.
CSCsz56297 (https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCsz56297/)
I was testing this setup. If route matched by all prefix-lists (PL-VRF1,PL-VRF2,PL-VRF3) it gets only RT 65000:1. If route matched by PL-VRF2, PL-VRF3 prefix-lists it gets only RT 65000:2. If route matched by PL-VRF3 prefix-list it gets RT 65000:3.
...
