Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
If I use a 1200 with both A and G radios, can't I only hook one antenna up to each radio? If so doesn't this reduce the effectiveness of both radios due to multi-path interference and not being able to use 2 antennas for diversity?
PEAP seems like a solid, well supported solution. EAP-FAST seems like its got lots of nice features but isn't well supported on non-cisco client devices.Can someone break down the advantages of EAP-FAST over PEAP? What am I loosing with PEAP that mak...
My understanding is that the 1200 uses a modular radio(s), hence it being able to do both a and b/g. So hopefully you could simply replace the radio component and upgrade IOS to provide N capability. The antennea might be another story.
Yes, I've done this on 1100's, should be the same on a 1200 running IOS. If you configure the AP with the standard ios dhcp commands (dhcp pool) it works just fine.-Shon
Thanks for the reply Dixon. Unfortunatley it's still not quite clear.I understand that wireless devices can roam in the manner you described, by jumping to an AP with a stronger signal. But as I understand it, this is handled by the client alone, and...
Thanks Jeremy.So just to clarify, most of the SWAN documentation I've seen indicates that using either LEAP or FAST is a requirement for Fast Secure Roaming. Are you saying that I can use PEAP and still get the benefits of FSR?Thanks!
What roaming solution is available for clients using PEAP? I don't need layer 3 roaming, but roaming between APs in the same subnet is a requirement. Is there a way to do this without using LEAP or FAST?
