Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
It looks like a partner company will probably need access on our SAN, and they are a fujitsu shop(I've gotten only an email stating a quick meeting with them next week and mentioning fujitsu). So, I deal only with EMC and IBM hardware, and haven't us...
I have a pending upgrade coming. I already know about the 9500 switch reboot and have taken precautions. My question is mainly around hba support. If the servers support the current version of 3.0.2a, am I going to have problems with the upgrade to 3...
Anybody know the best way to get this part back to factory defaults? The bladecenter management console offers the option of "restore to default" which is anything but. The thing keeps zonesets active from wherever you pulled it, resulting in an isol...
There is a good chance of disruption if you are moving from 3.0 upward. There is a workaround listed in the caveats that a prior posted, which basically is you creating a channel group then deleting it...but check the details in depth before you do i...
Okay, the word from cisco and IBM is that they need to be sent in for reset on a bench(you can do it otherwise, but it would void the warranty I'm sure).I got the issue resolved without doing this, but it was a long and complicated process over the p...
Since you are at 3.0 already, I'm thinking that it is non-disruptive. Hopefully someone will come along and correct me if I'm wrong, but I recall that being the big bonus of 3.XI would start at the core switch(the 9509), as I also recall some issue w...
Won't you still end up segmenting the traffic at some hop along the way though? All that assembly and disassembly to get it to the other side sounds like a headache....
