Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I'm trying to get client-based VPN running for our network (using our ASA), and have run in to a snag. I was able to figure out most of the settings, and get the VPN itself set up in such a way as the user can connect. However, once connected, the ...
We're trying to get a new ASA 5505 put in place on our network after the untimely demise of our 1841 router. One of the functions of the router that we need to get back up and running is a pair of VPNs to employees that we have working from off-site...
I'm trying to get a new 5505 installed in our network to replace the 1841 that died over the past few days (memory issues). One of the big pieces of functionality that the old router gave us was the ability to open certain ports to the outside world...
I've got an 1841 router and am using NAT to expose certain IPs and ports to the outside world so that external users can see internal resources (namely, web sites). However, I can't seem to get it running such that I can visit the external IP addres...
I recently picked up a Catalyst 2960G and am trying to get SNMP management working over IPv6. I have the IP Address set to the local link, and can successfully ping and telnet to the switch (so the network can get traffic to and from the switch). H...
After much investigation and a few long days, we've determined that this issue was caused by factors outside the ASA. The configuration is correct, and we are up and running.Thanks to everyone for their help.Matt
Julio -As seen in the other thread, the VPN answer took care of it - thanks!On the NAT side, however, I don't think that's what I'm looking for. In the end, I want to be able to NAT any traffic sent to .177 through .189 - such as this:static (inside...
Joseph -That answers a lot. Could not figure out why everything else works, but not this. I don't have BugTool access, so I can't look at the specifics, but this is at least a step in the right direction.So, being a bit of a new-comer to the IPv6 w...
Really, I would expect it fail. If the IP address isn't working, I would not expect the name (which is resolving to the proper IP address) to work either. Flushing the DNS on my client isn't going to have any effect, since it is resolving to the pr...
