Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Good day, We are working on a multi-VRF environment with configured BGP.P-P is configured on subinterfaces and is working fine for vrf A.However, for VRF B the interfaces are fine but BFD isn't working. Ping is working but somehow BFD sessions aren't...
Good day,
I have 2 connected switches over a p2p link using BGP.
we want to only allow connection to the internet (Public IP ranges) and some internal network ports to be exposed. However, the below test is not working at all. All the matches are on ...
Goodmorning, Bellow the full list and this is working.Allowing a BGP connection on the interface subnet /24 as I'm doing another switch I did add another range as well (172.22.193.0 and 172.22.194.0)This is blocking any private IP address and allowin...
I'm very sorry, I think I found the problem if you do something like this you should also apply it on the second switch in order to get it working and do a full test.... Sorry for your time! I will upload my full ACL list so at least someone who is w...
Thanks for the fast response! I did change the treat.There is a BGP session running on the same interface so that need's to get true. But to make it more clear I want to block 172.22.201.52. However, if I ping it I can see that it got a hit on : 90 ...
Hi I head the same problem, you can use te following to fix this: #switch 4 renumber 1#do rw and "reload" If you see also 1/0/1 and 2/01 you can use the bellow command to remove 2 #no switch 2 provision
