Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have two Aironet 1310, connecting two office buildings. Association works fine, they get linked at 54MBit/s. But when we measure throughput, we get results between 8 and max. 15MBit/s.We can see CRC errors climbing up, but signal strenghts is quit...
How can i see, which network/port settings the ata has negotiated with a switch? There is a case, where a switch tells me a 100MBit fd connection and a cdp message on the voice gateway (Cisco2621XM) tells me, that the ata (his mac address) is seen as...
There are three campus buildings connected via routed laser links (100Mbit Ethernet). There are several days within a year, where fog disrupts the communication. We have installed a routed WLAN-Bridge solution for backup. EIGRP is used as the routing...
Hi,i think the title tells it all. How do i configure the voice gateway from ccm with the components described above?I think, MGCP shoul be possible but when we choos 26xx-gateway in the "add mgcp gateway" dialog there is no chance to enter Slot0 as ...
When we use QoS processing by means of DSCP values, will the process be in hard- or software? There has been a statement in the documentation, that software is always used, when special IP header entries are processed.Thanks for clarificationjo
Thanks for the hint. We have also tried this. Actual situation after following all the hints in configuration documents ist: Throughput without ANY security settings (except MAC filter and no broadcast ssid...) ist about 25MBit/s net. When we enable ...
Thanks for response. Yes, the 2621XM is configured for 100FD. Also, when i disable auto negotiation on the switch connecting the ATA there is no difference. Regardless of any connection configuration the router tells me, that the ATA connects with ha...
The solution - in my case - has been to use the "dampening" command of the IOS (actual only available on 7xxx and above platforms), which allows to restrict flapping interfaces from being inserted into routing table until the link is stable again (co...
Thanks for information. We will use H323 and wait for the mgcp support...Is it so difficult or so unimportant to support those configurations (belongs also to all kind of bri connections - we are from germany...)?
Thank you for the information. But what are then "special IP header". Is it somewhat like application specific (properitary) extensions or changes to the header?Just for satisfying my interest: Can you give me an example of those special headers?
