Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About abdul.qadir5001
Stats
Member since
01-18-2020
19
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
02-25-2020
07:44 PM
Can we prefer the type 3 LSA to originate from two different areas sent to the non-backbone area?
... View more
Labels:
02-22-2020
09:37 PM
In IPSec Tunnel phase 1 is up and phase 2 is not up then whats the issue of it. Thanks
... View more
Labels:
02-14-2020
03:54 AM
Dear Georg Pauwen, I understood the ospf loop mechanism. Also IP mtu link is very useful. Thanks for your guidence.
... View more
02-13-2020
11:15 PM
Q1: How Inter-Area routes are subject to routing loop in OSPF. Q2:“IP ospf mtu ignore” What is the potential threat of this command .
... View more
Labels:
02-13-2020
11:09 PM
Howto avoid OSPF routing loops. When i google it then i come to know that "The loop avoidance is inherent in the SPF algorithm,which OSPF (as a link-state routing protocol) uses to calculate routes.This way, a tree is built for each router with itself as the root.Trees by definition do not have loops.Extensions to this tree exist only for load-balancing reasons." Kinsly guide plz that i cannot understand it. Thanks
... View more
Labels:
02-06-2020
04:13 AM
Hello All, I am new in Security.I am using cisco ASA 8.4 in GNS3. I am running RIP among 2 routers with Firewall to advertise the network. I have also advertised the loopbacks in rip but still no readability in the routing table. RIP is also configured on ASA FW. Config are attached. Kindly guide to troubleshoot the issue. Thanks
... View more
Labels:
02-04-2020
04:08 AM
Dear Jon Marshal, Bur How can we avoid from redistribution between PE and CE. Kindly guide plz
... View more
02-02-2020
09:57 PM
Dear Folks, I am studying the CBT Nuggets Keith Barker MPLS Fundamentals videos. While i am studying the redistribution lecture, i am not understood what is asked on below yellow highlighted question and whats its answer. Kindly help me to understand the query and its answer. Thanks
... View more
Labels:
02-02-2020
01:33 AM
Q1) How originator ID is used to avoid RR loops. Q2) If we have two RR and one PE and PE has neighborship with both RR. Then how PE decides that it should take routes from either RR1 or RR2. Thanks.
... View more
Labels:
02-02-2020
01:06 AM
Now the issue is being resolved by importing RT. Thanks Paul Driver.
... View more
02-01-2020
10:13 AM
Dear Paul Driver, Its awesome. Very nice. It worked.Thank you very uch. Now CBT site 1 and 2 can reach each other. CBT2Site2#ping 172.16.101.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.101.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 148/168/188 ms CBT2Site2#sh ip route Gateway of last resort is not set 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks B 172.16.222.2/32 [20/0] via 192.168.202.1, 00:21:24 B 172.16.101.0/30 [20/0] via 192.168.202.1, 00:21:24 192.168.202.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 192.168.202.0 is directly connected, Ethernet2/1 192.168.222.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 192.168.222.2 is directly connected, Loopback0 Q1) But some issue in ACME site 1 and site 2. They cannot ping each other. Q2) Second Question is below: ip vrf 101:ACME rd 1.1.1.1:1 route-target import 1.1.1.1:102 ip vrf 102:CBT rd 1.1.1.1:2 route-target import 1.1.1.1:102 (Why not we used this 1.1.1.1:101 in CBT vrf ) Q3) Also if we use same RD and RT value then no need of extra command that you mentioned(route-target import 1.1.1.1:102). Why? For example vrf "Atlas-Honda" RD and RT same value 38264:5142 we have no need of extra command. ip vrf Atlas-Honda rd 38264:5142 route-target export 38264:5142 route-target import 38264:5142
... View more
02-01-2020
06:23 AM
Dear Paul Driver, Extra configurations are removed now and redistribution enabled on both PEs. Also that router bgp 65535 address-family ipv4 vrf 102:CBT redistribute eigrp 1 02 <---------- shouldn't this be redistribute 1 (102 is EIGRP AS number running on customer side) address-family ipv4 vrf 101:ACME redistribute ospf 1 01 vrf 101:ACME <-------------shouldn't this be redistribute ospf 1 (101 is OSPF AS number running on customer side) so no need to change as numbers. But still after changing the config routes are not exchanging between customer site 1 and site 2. If you have any query further kindly let me know plz but kindly guide to resolve the issue. Latest config are attached. Thanks
... View more
02-01-2020
02:00 AM
Yes R1 and R5 can ping each other but ACME site1 cannot ping ACME site2. VRF table on PE cannot contain routes of remote site routes. Kindly guide configurations and topology are provided earlier. Thanks R1#ping 5.5.5.5 source loopback 0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 5.5.5.5, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 1.1.1.1 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 108/134/172 ms R1#sh bgp vpnv4 unicast vrf 101:ACME Route Distinguisher: 1.1.1.1:1 (default for vrf 101:ACME) *> 172.16.101.0/30 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ? *> 172.16.111.2/32 172.16.101.2 11 32768 ? R1#sh bgp vpnv4 unicast vrf 102:CBT Route Distinguisher: 1.1.1.1:2 (default for vrf 102:CBT) *> 172.16.101.0/30 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ? *> 172.16.222.2/32 172.16.101.2 409600 32768 ?
... View more
02-01-2020
12:28 AM
I have an issue while configuring MPLS L3 VPN that customers of CBTSite1 on one PE and Customer of CBTSite2 on remote PE cannot communicate with each other. One site one EIGRP is running and site 2 EBGP is running. Routes are reachable on respective PE but not able to reach on other PE. MPLS and OSPF is running on provider routers. Configurations are below. Kindly guide plz to resolve the issue. Thanks
... View more
- Tags:
- balaji.bandi
Labels:
02-25-2020
Can we prefer the type 3 LSA to originate from two different areas sent
to the non-backbone area?
02-14-2020
Dear Georg Pauwen, I understood the ospf loop mechanism.Also IP mtu link
is very useful.Thanks for y...
02-13-2020
Q1: How Inter-Area routes are subject to routing loop in OSPF. Q2:“IP
ospf mtu ignore” What is the p...
02-13-2020
Howto avoid OSPF routing loops. When i google it then i come to know
that "The loop avoidance is inh...
02-06-2020
Hello All,I am new in Security.I am using cisco ASA 8.4 in GNS3. I am
running RIP among 2 routers wi...
02-04-2020
Dear Jon Marshal, Bur How can we avoid from redistribution between PE
and CE. Kindly guide plz
02-02-2020
Dear Folks, I am studying the CBT Nuggets Keith Barker MPLS Fundamentals
videos. While i am studying...
02-02-2020
Q1) How originator ID is used to avoid RR loops.Q2) If we have two RR
and one PE and PE has neighbor...
02-01-2020
Dear Paul Driver, Its awesome. Very nice. It worked.Thank you very uch.
Now CBT site 1 and 2 can rea...
02-01-2020
Dear Paul Driver,Extra configurations are removed now and redistribution
enabled on both PEs.Also th...
02-01-2020
Yes R1 and R5 can ping each other but ACME site1 cannot ping ACME site2.
VRF table on PE cannot cont...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 01-18-2020 05:43 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 02-25-2020 07:42 PM |
| Total Messages Posted | 19 |
Helpful Votes Given To
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 20 | |
| 15 | |
| 5 | |
| 15 | |
| 15 |
.jpg "VIP Mentor"){kind=icon}
.jpg "Hall of Fame Guru"){kind=icon}
