Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
My customer has a 5505 at home that is using EZVPN back to a 5510 head end. Behind the 5505 he has a laptop and a Cisco 'Soft' phone installed upon it. He can make calls but is getting only one way audio. People can hear him but he cannot hear any...
Does anyone know if it is possible to setup a virtual web app on ACE WAF such that it would return a 301 code back to the client, and not send the request back to the internal destination server?All I would need it to do is see the URI for the root o...
We currently have MARS archiving every 10 days to an NFS mount that is configured in the web interface.Our quesition essentially is if we didn't do the archive at all, what would be the expected retention level of the data inside the appliance. This...
I am working for a customer implementing MARS 5.3.2 (2764). They have a lot of Windows servers they are receiving events from via SNARE. They would like to be able to execute commands on the servers depending on the event they see. For example, if...
I am working with a client to deploy a new DC co-lo and have a question about the power receptacles being supplied.The co-lo is suggesting they are going to give us L6-30R, 208V/30A receptacles in the rack. The 6509 chassis we have ordered all have ...
Yeah actually I checked into that and all looks good. Actually learned from the customer that the problem isn't really behind the 5505, but instead when he uses the VPN client direct. Still can't find a NAT problem but it would appear that perhaps ...
There is a standalone ACE WAF being used in this situation (dual manager/gateway). There is no LB in front or behind and that's why I was asking.We could of course do the 301 from the backend server, but I don't wanna.
Actually no I am not talking about the probes. Sorry for the confusion. On the CSM there is in-band monitoring of the HTTP codes being returned to the client. Documentation says that I can set a threshold and if so many of a particular code is see...
No, this doesn't work. This will clear the counters on your vservers and other objects, but not the LB Statistics such as:LB Rjct: L7 max parse lenAt least what I have seen on CSM 4.2(3).What are we missing? Probably something simple...
This has been confirmed. Try many different times from both the Telco and our perspective. It would appear you can't do it unless both sides are matching.
