02-04-2020 12:56 AM - edited 02-21-2020 09:51 PM
Dear Concern,
Presently we have configure GRE tunnel on my switch 3650-48-TS form my HO site to Remote site-A and site-B, both the tunnels are working fine.
Last week we shifted GRE to ipsec over GRE on my Cisco 3650-48-TS switch with IOS version 16.3.3 on VIP interface (using HSRP) but facing the problem while establishing both the tunnels simultaneously.
ACLs are created with keywork any
permit 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
We have created multiple ACL for both remote sites and separate ISAkmp polices called in same crypto map.
While establishing tunnel phase 2 it creation it creates problem.
Currently we able to communicate one site at time.
Kindly find attached diagram
Your opinion about and suggestion weather my hardware device (Cisco switch 3650) with current ios support the scenario or not.
Regards
02-08-2020 11:25 PM
Hi Muhammad,
If both VPN's contain the same interesting traffic(crypto map ACL: permit 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 any), it is normal that only one VPN would be up at a time.
It would mean that the interesting traffic will be overlapping on both crypto maps and only one will take over.
Workaround: To define the remote networks on the crypto ACL's instead of using "any" as destination.
For further t-shooting we would need debugs to determine why the VPN would not come up:
debug crypto isakmp
debug crypto ipsec
Rate if it helps.
Regards,
Josue Brenes
TAC - VPN Engineer.
02-11-2020 10:51 PM
04-26-2023 12:17 PM
Hi Muhammad,
I have the similar requirement of creating a GRE tunnel protected with IPSec between two C3650 running on IOS 16.6.7-ipservicesk9.
I am able to configure the tunnel and it is up and it is passing traffic. Tunnel interface does not show any in/out packets. cryto ipsec is also not showing any encaps/decaps so I am not sure if switch is encrypting anything.
Do you know if IPSec is support on C3650?
04-27-2023 06:34 PM
Hello S Kumar,
Check the unsupported features section :
Release Notes for Cisco Catalyst 3650 Series Switches, Cisco IOS XE Everest 16.6.x - Cisco
HTH!
04-28-2023 06:05 PM
Hey Amine,
Appreciate your help, the document you shared is very helpful and cleared all the confusion.
Do you happen to know similar document for Cisco 1921 IOS 15.5.3 with SEC license? I searched but could not fine it. I have these 1921 sitting on shelf, I might use then for this tunnel if IPSEC is supported. Your help would be much appreciated.
04-30-2023 09:36 PM
Hello Kumar,
Search for ipsec keyword
Cisco 1921 Series Integrated Services Routers Data Sheet - Cisco
Also check :
End-of-Sale and End-of-Life Announcement for the Cisco 1941 and 1921 Integrated Services Routers - Cisco
Make sure the 1921 can handle the ipsec throughput you are trying to achieve.
Don't forget to rate helpful posts!
Regards!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide