06-13-2007 07:40 AM
Hi,
Just wondering whether anyone can help me here with a weird VPN problem. Basically offic A connects to office B over a VPN. In office A there is a c3640 VPN headend, which connects to a PIX506 at Office B. At office A there are 6 private subnets and at office B only 1.
The VPN is working for all subnets other than 1 I have just added. When I run a debug on the PIX in office B, I get the following error:
pix-1# IPSEC(validate_proposal_request): proposal part #1,
(key eng. msg.) dest= 1.1.1.1, src= 2.2.2.2,
dest_proxy= 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type=4),
src_proxy= 192.168.18.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type=4),
protocol= ESP, transform= esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
lifedur= 0s and 0kb,
spi= 0x0(0), conn_id= 0, keysize= 0, flags= 0x4
IPSEC(validate_transform_proposal): peer address 2.2.2.2 not found
"1.1.1.1" is the 3640 in office A, "2.2.2.2" is the pix in office B (where the message is generated).
After researching this it seems that there's an issue with my access-lists, in that they're not mirrored. But I can't see anything wrong with them:
3640
access-list 178 permit ip 172.21.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 178 permit ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 178 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 178 permit ip 10.11.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 178 permit ip 10.50.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 178 permit ip 10.51.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 178 permit ip 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 178 permit ip 192.168.11.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
Pix
access-list 103 permit ip 172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0 any
access-list 103 permit ip 172.21.0.0 255.255.0.0 any
access-list 103 permit ip 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 any
access-list 103 permit ip 10.11.0.0 255.255.0.0 any
access-list 103 permit ip 10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0 any
access-list 103 permit ip 10.51.0.0 255.255.0.0 any
access-list 103 permit ip 192.168.18.0 255.255.255.0 any
I'm really struggling to see where the problem lies here - does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
J
06-13-2007 11:40 PM
Hi
Could you post full configs minus any sensitive information.
It could be to do with the order of your lines in you access-list rather than whether a line is missing or not matching. Could you specify what the source and destination IP addresses are when you try your test.
Jon
06-14-2007 01:42 AM
Apologies, the PIX access-list should have been:
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.21.0.0 255.255.0.0
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.11.0.0 255.255.0.0
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.51.0.0 255.255.0.0
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.18.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.11.0 255.255.255.0
Source add 192.168.18.254, dest 192.168.0.8
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide