10-08-2015 06:02 PM - edited 02-21-2020 08:29 PM
Has anyone gotten this setup to work?
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/118835-config-asa-00.html
I have it labbed out, and I am able to bring up VPN tunnel, a BGP neighborship, and routes propagate.
I see the routes for 172.16.20.0/24 and 172.16.30.0/24 on both devices. But, the subnets are unable to communicate.
Does 172.16.20.0/24 and 172.16.30.0/24 need to be added to the crypto map? Or should 172.16.20.0/24 and 172.16.30.0/24 be able to communicate through the tunnel without be explicitly added, relying on the BGP relationship?
Any help would be great, much thanks!
10-09-2015 01:52 PM
Hi Ralph,
I recommend you to check the routing table of each device "show route ", also a packet-tracer will be helpful as well. Maybe an ACL or rule is dropping this traffic.
Example:
packet-tracer input inside icmp <src IP > 8 0 <dst IP > detailed
Hope it helps
- Randy-
10-09-2015 06:53 PM
Hi,
You need to have Nonat rules on both end and ACL added to crypto rules.
hth
MS
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide