Wow, bad news all around. Last year my understanding was that 4Q 2012 was when IPv6 support would be supported. I just guessed that from this thread, but I actually don't believe anything that I hear about this, because it always has the usual disclaimers attached to it. I guess it comes when it comes, and I will just resolve to be careful about buying anything from Cisco that's not a router or a switch, because that's obviously where they put most of their "forward thinking." Red-headed step-children, e.g., products that have been acquired from the purchase of other companies are literally years behind.
They put IPv6 support into the ESA, which I personally think is not as important as putting it into the WSA. The reason being that if someone relys on a WSA for proxy and filtering functions, they basically cannot roll out IPv6 to end-users, because once you roll it out, people can get right past the WSA (especially in a wccp situation without an explicit proxy set on the clients). And of course many questionable sites are already on IPv6, because they have a stake in getting around old filtering products that don't keep up with the times.
Thus closes my rant and my hopes that a once-great product will be again. I will have to be content with rolling out IPv6 to the DMZ only.
