cisco wireless C9800H2 interfaces limitation

[Ahmed Gamal]

Dear Team 

Could I utilize the CW9800H2 Forty-Gigabit interfaces along with the 10-Gigabit interfaces, or are there any limitations?
I am planning to use two Forty-Gigabit and three 10-Gigabit interfaces.

Thanks and best regards 

[MHM Cisco World]

You meaning make PO include both interface? It that your Q no you can not.

PO must include port member have same BW/speed 

MHM

[Ahmed Gamal]

@MHM Cisco World 

I plan to utilize both Forty-Gigabit (40G) interfaces in a port-channel for normal traffic, and the other three 10-Gigabit (10G) interfaces for isolated traffic.

However, I heard that the CW9800H2 has a throughput limitation of 80G, which might mean that if I use both 40G interfaces, I cannot utilize any additional interfaces.

Could you please confirm whether this limitation applies, and advise on the best approach to achieve my intended setup?

[MHM Cisco World]

I plan to utilize both Forty-Gigabit (40G) interfaces in a port-channel for normal traffic, and the other three 10-Gigabit (10G) interfaces for isolated traffic. <<- can you more elaborate 

MHM

[Ahmed Gamal]

@MHM Cisco World 

The both Forty-Gigabit (40G) interfaces will handle the access-point traffic and normal user traffic in port-channel throughput will be 80G , The other 10G interfaces for specific SSIDs like Guest ...etc. so if i used three more interfaces so the throughput will be 110G what's the limitation of CW9800H2  

[Leo Laohoo]

---

@Ahmed Gamal wrote:
The both Forty-Gigabit (40G) interfaces will handle the access-point traffic and normal user traffic in port-channel throughput will be 80G , The other 10G interfaces for specific SSIDs like Guest ...etc. so if i used three more interfaces so the throughput will be 110G what's the limitation of CW9800H2  

---

That kind of archaic "design" is no longer in fashion. 

And if someone wants to do this, I can guarantee the WLC will be very unstable.

[Ahmed Gamal]

Could you clarify — do you mean that segregating the wireless traffic is an unstable solution?
I have already implemented this approach before.

[Leo Laohoo]

---

@Ahmed Gamal wrote:
I have already implemented this approach before.

---

This design was OK in AireOS.  But a controller on IOS-XE?   I would not give IOS-XE an excuse to chuck a wobbly. 

9800-40/-80/M/H1/H2 cannot even operate at full scale without crashing much alone a very old design of segregating traffic on a per-port basis. 

[MHM Cisco World]

Mr @Leo Laohoo  Mr @Ahmed Gamal  design is work and list in cisco slides 
issue the doc not clear about the 2x40 G and total throughput of WLC 100G

[Ahmed Gamal]

@MHM Cisco World 

Here the Datasheet 

[MHM Cisco World]

Yes I know wlc throughput is 100G

But that not meaning you can not use all interface' but let me check limitations' i will update you tomorrow

Thanks for waiting 

MHM

[Ahmed Gamal]

@MHM Cisco World 

Thanks and waiting