04-18-2020 12:35 AM - edited 04-18-2020 12:46 AM
Hi All,
new beginner here, since last time the TPM issue was solve so my work could continue on, but after that i have facing another issue that showing as below,
may i ask is there any pre-configuration relate the BIOS or thr RAID adapter controller?
07:22:07 E: 2020/04/18 07:22:07 info extracting duration=23m25.112915997s
07:22:08 O: sending incremental file list
07:22:08 O: boot-hook
07:22:08 O: post-install-hook
07:22:08 O: product
07:22:08 O:
07:22:08 O: sent 10652 bytes received 72 bytes 21448.00 bytes/sec
07:22:08 O: total size is 10438 speedup is 0.97
07:22:08 O: sending incremental file list
07:22:08 O: ./
07:22:08 O: fwrepos -> /firmware/fwrepos
07:22:08 O:
07:22:08 O: sent 66 bytes received 18 bytes 168.00 bytes/sec
07:22:08 O: total size is 17 speedup is 0.20
07:22:08 O: sending incremental file list
07:22:08 O: ./
07:22:08 O:
07:22:08 O: sent 29 bytes received 15 bytes 88.00 bytes/sec
07:22:08 O: total size is 0 speedup is 0.00
07:22:08 E: 2020/04/18 07:22:08 warn could not mount lv securedata in copyFilesToLV, ignoring
07:22:08 O: sending incremental file list
07:22:08 O: ./
07:22:08 O: crash/
07:22:08 O:
07:22:08 O: sent 54 bytes received 19 bytes 146.00 bytes/sec
07:22:08 O: total size is 0 speedup is 0.00
07:22:08 O: sending incremental file list
07:22:08 O: ./
07:22:08 O:
07:22:08 O: sent 29 bytes received 15 bytes 88.00 bytes/sec
07:22:08 O: total size is 0 speedup is 0.00
07:22:08 O: sending incremental file list
07:22:08 O: ./
07:22:08 O: fwrepos/
07:22:08 O: fwrepos/fwrepo.Local/
07:22:08 O: fwrepos/fwrepo.Local/aci-catalog-dk9-default.bin
07:22:08 O:
07:22:08 O: sent 74717 bytes received 42 bytes 149518.00 bytes/sec
07:22:08 O: total size is 74550 speedup is 1.00
07:22:09 E: 2020/04/18 07:22:09 info setting up newHash=757742f3f5103cef7b97c770a90e76f6e2b9995ecf272a54dde64d9d5528c5a5 serviceType=_ target=boot
07:22:09 E: 2020/04/18 07:22:09 info No setup to do for servicetype _ newHash=757742f3f5103cef7b97c770a90e76f6e2b9995ecf272a54dde64d9d5528c5a5 serviceType=_ target=boot
07:22:09 E: 2020/04/18 07:22:09 info setting up duration=10.982µs newHash=757742f3f5103cef7b97c770a90e76f6e2b9995ecf272a54dde64d9d5528c5a5 serviceType=_ target=boot
07:22:09 O: boot:4.0.1h-d691300 has no pre-update hook
07:22:16 E: Error: device or resource busy
07:22:16 E: failed mounting boot for rsync
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix.(*Atomix).GrubDoSetup
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/update.go:103
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix.(*Atomix).GrubSetup
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/update.go:262
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix.(*Atomix).SetHead
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/atomix.go:228
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix.(*Atomix).Install
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/install.go:248
07:22:16 E: main.doInstall
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/cli/install.go:67
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.HandleAction
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:501
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.Command.Run
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/command.go:165
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.(*App).Run
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:259
07:22:16 E: main.main
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/cli/main.go:61
07:22:16 E: runtime.main
07:22:16 E: /usr/lib/go-1.10/src/runtime/proc.go:198
07:22:16 E: runtime.goexit
07:22:16 E: /usr/lib/go-1.10/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:2361
07:22:16 E: Failed updating grub
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix.(*Atomix).SetHead
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/atomix.go:230
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix.(*Atomix).Install
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/install.go:248
07:22:16 E: main.doInstall
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/cli/install.go:67
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.HandleAction
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:501
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.Command.Run
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/command.go:165
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.(*App).Run
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:259
07:22:16 E: main.main
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/cli/main.go:61
07:22:16 E: runtime.main
07:22:16 E: /usr/lib/go-1.10/src/runtime/proc.go:198
07:22:16 E: runtime.goexit
07:22:16 E: /usr/lib/go-1.10/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:2361
07:22:16 E: Failed activating layer boot
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix.(*Atomix).Install
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/install.go:249
07:22:16 E: main.doInstall
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/cli/install.go:67
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.HandleAction
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:501
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.Command.Run
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/command.go:165
07:22:16 E: golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.(*App).Run
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:259
07:22:16 E: main.main
07:22:16 E: /root/go/src/golang.cisco.com/atom/atomix/cli/main.go:61
07:22:16 E: runtime.main
07:22:16 E: /usr/lib/go-1.10/src/runtime/proc.go:198
07:22:16 E: runtime.goexit
07:22:16 E: /usr/lib/go-1.10/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:2361
07:22:16 E: + cleanup
07:22:16 E: + rm -f /tmp/rRfN2tNg
07:22:16 E: + rm -f /tmp/lkf
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-22-2020 08:02 PM
I have seen something similar in past, you should try to rebuilt the RIAD. You can follow the following document.
04-22-2020 08:02 PM
I have seen something similar in past, you should try to rebuilt the RIAD. You can follow the following document.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide