02-10-2017 04:49 AM - edited 03-01-2019 05:09 AM
Hello everyone! We tried to configure a access port with the same vlan encap as a port in trunk mode, but we can´t because appeared an error
"Different encap modes are not allowed for an encap on a given interface"
I've read the following link and it is supported ..
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-10-2017 11:06 AM
Alrighty
To close the loop.
Turns out customers physical domain and static path was using AAEP "a" and the VMM domain was also using AAEP "a"
The EPGs using the VMM domain had a static encap vlan-43 and set to pre-provision. this was pushing the vlan as trunked regardless of discovery protocol adjacency and thus causing vlan-43 as 802.1p to fail.
After removing the static encap and changing the vmm domain to "immediate" the issue was resolved
02-10-2017 05:11 AM
Thanks for using SupportForums
based on the error it seems that you have another static path somewhere for 101/1/18 trying to use the same vlan as both trunk and untagged/access
could you please provide the following output from switch 101
-show vlan ex
-show int e1/18 switchport
thanks!
02-10-2017 06:06 AM
02-10-2017 06:17 AM
as i suspected
9 enet CE vlan-43
that vlan is already being trunked on that interface and as such cannot be the access/802.1p vlan as well
Trunking VLANs Allowed: 8-11,74-91,96-97,100-101,103-104,107-108
02-10-2017 07:20 AM
Hi Daniel! We are very confused. Could you explain a little more this? We only configured a static binding with this port in the epg 43, why does this port appears in many vlans?
I understand that vlan 9 is the vlan PI (local vlan en leaf101), but i dont understand how can we understand following line if we didnt configure it:
Trunking VLANs Allowed: 8-11,74-91,96-97,100-101,103-104,107-108
Also, we had tried to configure this stating binding in another epg (epg 137) and it worked fine.
I would appreciate it if you can give us some guidance on this..
Thanks again!
02-10-2017 07:33 AM
there must be some other static paths deploying that vlan on that interface. i have a feeling that interface is part of a vPC.
from the leaf again, could you send me the the following output?
-show port-channel summary
-show vpc ext
-moquery -c fvIfConn
and from the APIC
-moquery -c fvRsPathAtt
02-10-2017 08:06 AM
02-10-2017 08:32 AM
Do you want to just work with me on your existing case? send me an email and we can discuss offline and webex if needed
02-10-2017 11:06 AM
Alrighty
To close the loop.
Turns out customers physical domain and static path was using AAEP "a" and the VMM domain was also using AAEP "a"
The EPGs using the VMM domain had a static encap vlan-43 and set to pre-provision. this was pushing the vlan as trunked regardless of discovery protocol adjacency and thus causing vlan-43 as 802.1p to fail.
After removing the static encap and changing the vmm domain to "immediate" the issue was resolved
02-10-2017 11:33 AM
Thanks a lot! A pleasure working with you
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide