Trunk and untagged ports, same EPG, same leaf

[FFT]

Good morning,
I was trying to configure a trunk interface and an untagged one on the same leaf and same EPG through static ports configuration, but I discovered that is not possible.
So, I configured a second EPG, same vlan and same BD as the first one (EPG1 with trunk ports and EPG2 with untagged access ports) but the devices couldn't see each others.
Is it the correct way to achieve my goal or I'm doing wrong?
Thanks in advance!

[shutikov · Accepted solution]

Hello.

Try to use instead of access interface in first case - 802.1p

Trunk and 802.1p are possible for VLAN in one switch.

[FFT]

Hi,
It works with the interface in 802.1p!
However I don't understand why cisco does not permit to have an untagged interface but it does with the priority tag...
Thanks a lot!

[f.schubert@profi-ag.e]

We have been told to use second EPG, using Access Port type and using different VLAN for encapsulation. 

This VLAN can be any different, not externally used VLAN, since it is only used to transmit the packet into VXLAN mechanism. 

We also ask, why it it not possible to mix tagged and untagged ports in same EPG?