10-06-2004 07:35 PM
I have been reading through the docs and the tech pages and have been confounded by the indirection and misdirection of the documents as to showing an example of setting up a pair of CSS's for Active-Active loadsharing for two service offerings sitting behind the CSS's. Can someone send me a pointer to a good source or if you have a good working example, that would be great.
Next stop is TAC to have them explain why my configuration is not working as expected.
10-07-2004 12:32 AM
There are many definitions for active-active.
One is the same VIP active on 2 CSS.
This possible but it requires a 3rd CSS that becomes itself a point of congestion/failure so let's say immediately this is not interesting solution.
The 2nd meaning is 2 vips.
1 is active on CSS-A and the other one is active on CSS-B.
This is described at
Regards,
Gilles.
10-07-2004 05:17 PM
Gilles,
I have read this and it clouds the configuration. What I have is two CSS11503's. Both are connected to upstream to Cat6500's and downstream where the servers are they are connected to a 3550switch. All connections are Gigabit. There is also a pair of Gig connections on the CSS's that we have configured to pass state information between the two CSS's. I have the downstream link configured as a VLAN trunk for the two seperate services that I want to have running. VLAN12 will be primary on CSS1 and VLAN13 will be primary on CSS2.
When I so a show redundancy on the CSS's, it says that it is disabled.
Is there a better configuration that kind of mirrors my needs?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide