02-05-2008 10:44 AM
Hello
I have a cuestion regarding to the "port X" command into "service" definition.
Our real servers wait for data on tcp port (for example) 4443, 3444, 2444, etc, instead "original" ssl 443 port.
What is the aggregated load for the CSS with this configuration??
Do you recommend this PAT config like a better solution into the external Firewall instead on CSS??
Thanks in advance!!
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-05-2008 11:04 AM
the port command has no impact on performance.
It's safe to use.
Gilles.
02-05-2008 11:04 AM
the port command has no impact on performance.
It's safe to use.
Gilles.
02-05-2008 11:13 AM
Gilles,
Thanks for the quick response!!
We will probe this config, because we have some problems with the FW's PAT config.
Regards!!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide