12-22-2001 01:05 PM
In summary, what are the differences between LocalDirector and CSS? Where shoul done use one and not the other?
12-22-2001 07:22 PM
It's very different.
LD just a PC-based box,few feature,simple LB algorithm,not support L5-L7 persistency,low throughput.
CSS is ASIC-based box,many LB algorithm,support L5-L7 persistency,high throughput.But it's L7 app is not enough met customer need.For example,in the future,GPRS app is used anywhere,CSS must support WAP app and so on.Customer need CSS can support mobile-phone number persistency.
In the future,CSS's roadmap will be an app switch,it can identify all customer app,like domino,sap and so on.
Answer your 2nd question: when you deploy simple SLB,without persistency,without high throughput,without scalability,with few server,with few money,use LD,whereas,use L7 switch.
12-22-2001 11:18 PM
I agree on the WAP thing, but I do not agree on
the persistency, nor the performance issue.
The LD can do L5. It can do persistency and
it can do high throughput - well at least the
model 430. The LD is a solid box and it does
at good job on thousands of sites all over the
world. I have it, I tried it! And, it really
works fine with stateful failover - recently tried it
with more than 10000 tn3270 session!
The CSS cannot do it (yet)
Oh, btw. I also have several CSS in my shop -
they also work fine :-)
/Johnny
04-25-2002 02:29 PM
One thing want to mention on it.If you have UDP service except DNS, use CSS,forget those LD box.
I was tricked on this.LD won't send any keepalive packet to UDP port, such as ICMP, so if the server with UDP service is down, LD won;t know it, and continue to send traffic to that server.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide