07-23-2015 07:36 PM
Hello, have a N9372PX switches, according to the PAK number to apply for license, as the following:
MDS201507172040360360.Lic, but why when installing installation is not successful, suggests the following error:
switch# install license bootflash:MDS201507172040360360.lic
Installing license failed: A permanent license already exists for the feature
switch# dir
3291 May 29 10:47:09 2015 20150529_104709_poap_6477_init.log
3291 May 29 10:54:36 2015 20150529_105436_poap_6249_init.log
3375 Jul 18 03:15:28 2015 20150718_031520_poap_6248_init.log
321 Jul 18 03:54:34 2015 MDS201507172040360360.lic
4096 May 29 10:43:37 2015 home/
335 May 29 10:50:08 2015 license_SAL1920F30D_27.lic
16384 May 29 10:42:08 2015 lost+found/
444765696 May 29 10:43:33 2015 n9000-dk9.7.0.3.I1.1a.bin
4096 May 29 10:46:08 2015 scripts/
4096 May 29 10:45:44 2015 virtual-instance/
License_SAL1920F30D_27.Lic this is bring your own equipment, MDS201507172040360360.Lic according to PAL application more.
Why two activation functions, the new installation is not successful?thank you
Product Name : N93-LIC-PAK Product Description : N9300 License PAK Expansion Product Qty : 1 Product Authorization Key : 6541J7A673A Sales Order Number : 14168413 Serial Number : SAL1920F30D Options Included Quantity N93-LAN1K9 1
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-01-2015 01:01 AM
Hi,
It seems as though both file contain the same license package, and as one is already installed, the installation of the second fails.
If you run the command show license usage it will tell you any licenses that are already installed and in use. For example:
c9372-1# sh license usage Feature Ins Lic Status Expiry Date Comments Count -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NETWORK_SERVICE_PKG No - Unused - LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG Yes - In use Never - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you then run the command show license the first line of the output will indicate the file that was used to install the license. This will most likely be the License_SAL1920F30D_27.Lic file you show. If you then run the command show license MDS201507172040360360.Lic, you can see the license that file contains.
If they are the same e.g., both LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG, this would explain why the second gives an error when trying to install.
Regards
08-01-2015 01:01 AM
Hi,
It seems as though both file contain the same license package, and as one is already installed, the installation of the second fails.
If you run the command show license usage it will tell you any licenses that are already installed and in use. For example:
c9372-1# sh license usage Feature Ins Lic Status Expiry Date Comments Count -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NETWORK_SERVICE_PKG No - Unused - LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG Yes - In use Never - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you then run the command show license the first line of the output will indicate the file that was used to install the license. This will most likely be the License_SAL1920F30D_27.Lic file you show. If you then run the command show license MDS201507172040360360.Lic, you can see the license that file contains.
If they are the same e.g., both LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG, this would explain why the second gives an error when trying to install.
Regards
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide