cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2298
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

N9372 license Installation is not successful

zwgff
Level 1
Level 1

Hello, have a N9372PX switches, according to the PAK number to apply for license, as the following:
MDS201507172040360360.Lic, but why when installing installation is not successful, suggests the following error:

switch# install license bootflash:MDS201507172040360360.lic

Installing license failed: A permanent license already exists for the feature

 

switch# dir

       3291    May 29 10:47:09 2015  20150529_104709_poap_6477_init.log

       3291    May 29 10:54:36 2015  20150529_105436_poap_6249_init.log

       3375    Jul 18 03:15:28 2015  20150718_031520_poap_6248_init.log

        321    Jul 18 03:54:34 2015  MDS201507172040360360.lic

       4096    May 29 10:43:37 2015  home/

        335    May 29 10:50:08 2015  license_SAL1920F30D_27.lic

      16384    May 29 10:42:08 2015  lost+found/

  444765696    May 29 10:43:33 2015  n9000-dk9.7.0.3.I1.1a.bin

       4096    May 29 10:46:08 2015  scripts/

       4096    May 29 10:45:44 2015  virtual-instance/

 

License_SAL1920F30D_27.Lic this is bring your own equipment, MDS201507172040360360.Lic according to PAL application more.

Why two activation functions, the new installation is not successful?thank you

Product Name                : N93-LIC-PAK
    Product Description         : N9300 License PAK Expansion
    Product Qty                 : 1
    Product Authorization Key   :  6541J7A673A
    Sales Order Number          : 14168413
    Serial Number                : SAL1920F30D
    

    Options Included               Quantity
N93-LAN1K9                     1

 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Steve Fuller
Level 9
Level 9

Hi,

It seems as though both file contain the same license package, and as one is already installed, the installation of the second fails.

If you run the command show license usage it will tell you any licenses that are already installed and in use. For example:

c9372-1# sh license usage
Feature                      Ins  Lic   Status Expiry Date Comments
                                 Count
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NETWORK_SERVICE_PKG           No    -   Unused             -
LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG  Yes    -   In use Never       -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you then run the command show license the first line of the output will indicate the file that was used to install the license. This will most likely be the License_SAL1920F30D_27.Lic file you show. If you then run the command show license MDS201507172040360360.Lic, you can see the license that file contains.

If they are the same e.g., both LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG, this would explain why the second gives an error when trying to install.

Regards

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

Steve Fuller
Level 9
Level 9

Hi,

It seems as though both file contain the same license package, and as one is already installed, the installation of the second fails.

If you run the command show license usage it will tell you any licenses that are already installed and in use. For example:

c9372-1# sh license usage
Feature                      Ins  Lic   Status Expiry Date Comments
                                 Count
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NETWORK_SERVICE_PKG           No    -   Unused             -
LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG  Yes    -   In use Never       -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you then run the command show license the first line of the output will indicate the file that was used to install the license. This will most likely be the License_SAL1920F30D_27.Lic file you show. If you then run the command show license MDS201507172040360360.Lic, you can see the license that file contains.

If they are the same e.g., both LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG, this would explain why the second gives an error when trying to install.

Regards