cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
736
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Service Transition Issue

ganeshp
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

My CSS 11501 is connected to 2 Server using port 1 and port 2, the 3 port connected to the firewall.

I've keep getting as below on my log:

JUN 12 01:38:24 1/1 130 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

JUN 12 01:47:59 1/1 131 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

JUN 12 01:48:29 1/1 132 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server1-80 -> down

JUN 16 00:21:50 1/1 133 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

JUN 16 00:27:10 1/1 134 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

JUN 17 17:55:57 1/1 135 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

JUN 18 07:39:07 1/1 136 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

JUN 18 07:39:39 1/1 137 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server1-80 -> down

JUN 20 03:11:32 1/1 138 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

JUN 21 03:03:43 1/1 139 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server1-80 -> down

JUN 21 03:11:34 1/1 140 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

JUN 22 03:03:45 1/1 141 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server1-80 -> down

JUN 22 03:11:41 1/1 142 NETMAN-2: Enterprise:Service Transition:Server2-80 -> down

I'm curious

1) why the transition is only detected on 1/1?

2) how can port 1/1 detect the services for port 80 Server2 is also down.

Can this be a server issue or the CSS port issue?

my sample config:

!************************** SERVICE **************************

service Server1-80

ip address 172.1.1.20

port 80

keepalive type tcp

keepalive frequency 60

active

service Server2-80

ip address 172.1.1.21

port 80

keepalive type tcp

keepalive frequency 60

active

owner L3-Owner

content L3_Rule-80

protocol tcp

add service Server1-80

add service Server2-80

vip address 172.1.1.22

port 80

balance aca

advanced-balance sticky-srcip

active

regards,

ganesh

1 Reply 1

Gilles Dufour
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

1/1 is not the port but the module reporting the problem. This is the SCM in slot 1 subslot 1.

This problem is most likely a layer 2 issue.

Do a 'show phy' and check the speed/duplex settings.

Try to hardcode the value you want - do not use auto negotiation.

if this is ok, try an icmp keepalive and see if it makes any difference.

Regards,

Gilles.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card