05-12-2015 11:24 PM - edited 03-21-2019 10:25 AM
spa3102 gives a TP parse error:32 in syslog when pstn cid to voip cid is enabled, it detects the cid from pstn but when sends the call to gateway on the internet or pbx it doesnt escape the from heater name field, it needs to send the cid name field within quotes, plus when it doesnt detect cid name from pstn but jsut number, it insert garbage characters in from field but contact header display fine and strips out garbage characters.
this issue has been since long on previous firmware updates as well including the latest firmware
syslog details below in image
05-12-2015 11:32 PM
not quoting the cid name violates the RFC standard causing the device to not work with many PBX and switches like asterisk, freeswitch etc
05-23-2015 02:16 PM
Cisco technicians doesn't read those threads. If you wish to report the firmware bug, call SMB Support Center. But don't wish for so fast solution.
05-23-2015 11:17 PM
i have already done that and the person on the other end asked me to send a picture of the device with the serial number which i did at espasov@cisco.com after which i have emailed him couple of times on the status which he didnt reply to and i believe he has closed the ticket even.
Its no point having a support department which doesnt work at all and asking for support or bug fixes is like begging them to do it which they still dont do for years.
atleast when u sell a product in the market make sure it works even properly, its like, the product has a bug and u want them to fix it but they will only listen to u when u pay them to do so and that too has no guarantee if it will ever be fixed in years.
the last caller id issue took 6 years to fix and that too others still complain about it as still not working perfectly
05-24-2015 01:11 AM
My experience is the same. There's no good customer support for SMB.
As Cisco SMB phones have some exceptional features not seen elsewhere, we are not going to use phones of other vendor here. But it apply to phones only. Other VoIP components are non-Cisco all the times.
Unfortunately, I can't recommend a good FXO<->SIP gateway to you. Our installations are done mostly in Europe - and FXO is rather rare here. And even if our customer have one, it's easy to convert it to ISDN-2. So sorry, I have no personal experience with SPA3102 nor I can recommend a good replacement for it.
05-29-2015 07:12 PM
Re posted to ATAs, Gateway and Accessories
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide