07-29-2021 05:58 AM
I'm hoping someone can explain the difference I see when using different sanboxes. I'm trying to build a simple protoype network configuration to demonstrate how an Enterprise CML license could help my organization but I can't explain why when I use one of the CML sandboxes (HTML5) the simulation shows what I expect (CML_image) but when I reserve & use one of the VIRL sandboxes (like: Multi-IOS Cisco Test Network Sandbox) I see something very different (VIRL_image). The CML sandbox imports a yaml file but doesn't seem to have a way to run autonetkit while the virl boxes imports .virl files but only supports Live Visualization vs simulation and I've noticed that it has trouble synching between the editor and pane. Is this just the expected difference in behaviour between VIRL and CML? I wanted to have the ability to use the editor (like in VIRL) but be able to simulate configurations like CML. TIA
08-01-2021 08:59 AM
@spencera i would post this question in the VIRL/CML community here --> https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-modeling-labs-discussions/bd-p/12269101-discussions-modeling-labs
Hope this helps.
08-02-2021 04:02 AM
Thank bigevilbeard will do. I really want to understand what's happening.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide