09-09-2020 12:29 PM
C9500 does not have the AppGigabitEthernet interface for IOx apps, so it is slightly different from C9300.
All the examples I have found on Cisco documents/blogs relating to IOx containers on C9500 only point to using management network for connectivity.
I have upgraded the C9500 to ios 17.3.1 and managed to set up the Virtual Port Group on a custom vrf. The issue I am facing is that every alternate packet (ping test) is dropped. Here are my configs:
interface VirtualPortGroup0 ip vrf forwarding D1 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 !
app-hosting appid networktest app-vnic gateway0 virtualportgroup 0 guest-interface 0 guest-ipaddress 192.168.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 app-default-gateway 192.168.2.1 guest-interface 0
IP route on vrf looks good (adding only the relevant part):
192.168.2.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, VirtualPortGroup0 L 192.168.2.1/32 is directly connected, VirtualPortGroup0
Also, the arp resolution was fine on the vrf:
Internet 192.168.2.2 1 <container mac address> ARPA VirtualPortGroup0
Here is some ping from the container. I see the same behavior towards all subnets in this vrf. Here is the ping to the vpg0:
ping 192.168.2.1 PING 192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: seq=0 ttl=254 time=0.662 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: seq=1 ttl=254 time=0.826 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: seq=3 ttl=254 time=0.727 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.2.1: seq=5 ttl=254 time=0.631 ms
Since there is connectivity, but only every alternate packet is being dropped, I assume this is not an unsupported feature and could be either a simple missing/misconfiguration.
Has anyone managed to get a container networking connected to a customer vrf (or vlan) ? Is there some configuration that I am missing here.
09-09-2020 12:42 PM
I have tested long back with simple VLAN, not I have seen that ping Loss.(but it was not that lastest code).
Do you have any Control plane QoS enabled if so please check that and disabled and try. ?
Another question, Do you have other VLAN L3 interface have same ping Loss ? (not the container tagged one ?)
09-09-2020 01:29 PM
Thanks for your reply.
I disabled all the QoS config, but that did not seem to help.
One point to note - the loss is happening on the VirtualPortGroup when it is added to the vrf (everything seems to work fine on global)
Regarding VLAN, I am trying to use vrf rather than vlan.
interface VirtualPortGroup0 ip vrf forwarding D1 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
Were you using C9500 ? If so can you please let me know how you managed to run a container on vlan. I have containers working fine on vlan in C9300, but that had a special port named "AppGigabitEthernet" for containers that could be configured in trunk/access modes. However, C9500 seems to lack that feature.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide