11-30-2006 06:24 PM - edited 03-14-2019 07:01 PM
I have a quick question regarding 4500 QoS configuration. In reading the QoS SRND Guide, it states that shaping is recommended.
"This queue can be defined to be
shaped to a peak limit, such as 30%, to allow bandwidth to be available to non-voice applications. This
would be valuable in the event that a trust boundary has been compromised and a DoS/worm attack is
saturating voice queues"
But in other posts, I've read people do not recommend using shaping. Should I use shaping or just set queue 3 as a high priority queue
This is the config I have been using:
interface FastEthernet X/X
service-policy output DBL
qos trust cos
qos trust device cisco-phone
tx-queue 3
priority high
shape percent 30
Thanx for your help
12-06-2006 02:33 PM
If lot of voice traffic needs to be sent limiting the bandwidth to 30% would be a better option.Else we could go with setting queue 3 as a high priority queue.
12-08-2006 05:37 AM
From my very limited understanding of QOS (now on chapter 1 for the exam :)) it states that shaping actually slows down the packets to ensure that packets are not lost.
ive also read( dont kill the messenger) that using PQ starves non priority traffic and is not the ideal choice in queueing. using LLQ is better at queueing.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide