cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
418
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Transparent Lan extention and convergence

ger.kirby
Level 1
Level 1

hi,

i am using cisco 7600's in the core with 3500 at the edge for a lan extention solution. the core uses AToM and the 3525's use QinQ to transport customer VLans - the customers presentation is ethernet. the port config is below. I keep getting the same request regarding customer that bridge accross the connection (it is lan extention product so most customer do.)- In the event that the ethernet on site A is disconnected you have to wait for hello's in STP to time out before the link goes down - now STP can be optimized but is there any way using ethernet that the link failure detection at the remote end can be detected faster - we could present fibre

off a switch if it would help .. any ideas would be great..

thanks

ger

interface FastEthernet0/1

switchport access vlan 10

switchport mode dot1q-tunnel

switchport nonegotiate

switchport port-security maximum 5

switchport port-security aging time 1

switchport port-security violation restrict

switchport port-security aging type inactivity

no ip address

logging event bundle-status

logging event trunk-status

duplex full

speed 100

mls qos cos 5

mls qos cos override

mls qos monitor dscp 56 40

mls qos monitor packets

service-policy history

l2protocol-tunnel shutdown-threshold cdp 50

l2protocol-tunnel shutdown-threshold stp 400

l2protocol-tunnel shutdown-threshold vtp 50

l2protocol-tunnel cdp

l2protocol-tunnel stp

l2protocol-tunnel vtp

no cdp enable

spanning-tree portfast

spanning-tree bpdufilter enable

1 Reply 1

umedryk
Level 5
Level 5

I am not really sure but this could be something to do with mls settings. You could meddle around with them to check if it works better.