04-04-2012 02:56 AM
Hello,
I'm having an intermittent issue with LDP sessions dropping between one specific router and it's two peers.
Solution background:
We have 3 x 7201 (NPE-G2) running c7200p-spservicesk9-mz.150-1.M5.bin.
The routers are arranged in a "triangle" with a link to each router utilising G0/2 + 3 on each router, IGP is OSPF with all routers + loopbacks being in OSPF Area 0. OSPF RID + MPLS RID is Lo0.
Routers are called ABC-CORE-1, CCC-CORE-1, CBC-CORE1.
During the "outage" the DLP session between ABC->CBC remains constant without issue, however the LDP sessions with CCC-CORE1 both drop stating the following:
ABC-CORE-1#show log
Apr 3 17:30:40.236: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.64.255.2:0 (1) is DOWN (Received error notification from peer: Holddown time expired)
Apr 3 17:30:44.180: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.64.255.2:0 (1) is UP
CCC-CORE-1#show log
.Apr 3 17:30:39: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.64.255.1:0 (1) is DOWN (Discovery Hello Hold Timer expired)
.Apr 3 17:30:43: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.64.255.1:0 (3) is UP
Neighbor output:
CCC-CORE-1#sh mpls ldp neigh 10.64.255.1 det
Peer LDP Ident: 10.64.255.1:0; Local LDP Ident 10.64.255.2:0
TCP connection: 10.64.255.1.646 - 10.64.255.2.36718
Password: not required, none, in use
State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 1191/1192; Downstream; Last TIB rev sent 130
Up time: 16:24:42; UID: 10; Peer Id 2;
LDP discovery sources:
GigabitEthernet0/2; Src IP addr: 10.64.0.1
holdtime: 15000 ms, hello interval: 5000 ms
Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
10.64.2.1 192.168.128.126 10.64.0.1 10.64.0.5
10.64.255.1 10.64.254.1
Peer holdtime: 180000 ms; KA interval: 60000 ms; Peer state: estab
Clients: Dir Adj Client
Capabilities Sent:
[Dynamic Announcement (0x0506)]
[Typed Wildcard (0x0970)]
Capabilities Received:
[Dynamic Announcement (0x0506)]
[Typed Wildcard (0x0970)]
ABC-CORE-1#show mpls ldp neigh 10.64.255.2 det
Peer LDP Ident: 10.64.255.2:0; Local LDP Ident 10.64.255.1:0
TCP connection: 10.64.255.2.36718 - 10.64.255.1.646
Password: not required, none, in use
State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 1193/1191; Downstream; Last TIB rev sent 130
Up time: 16:25:05; UID: 8; Peer Id 0;
LDP discovery sources:
GigabitEthernet0/2; Src IP addr: 10.64.0.2
holdtime: 15000 ms, hello interval: 5000 ms
Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
10.64.2.5 192.168.128.254 10.64.0.2 10.64.0.9
10.64.255.2 10.64.254.2
Peer holdtime: 180000 ms; KA interval: 60000 ms; Peer state: estab
Clients: Dir Adj Client
Capabilities Sent:
[Dynamic Announcement (0x0506)]
[Typed Wildcard (0x0970)]
Capabilities Received:
[Dynamic Announcement (0x0506)]
[Typed Wildcard (0x0970)]
I've just enabled MPLS IGP sync this morning aftere reading a few articles however I'm not convicnced that's going to make much difference, has anyone ever experieced this before?
Thanks,
Duncan.
04-11-2012 04:59 AM
Duncan Mossop wrote:
Hello,
I'm having an intermittent issue with LDP sessions dropping between one specific router and it's two peers.
Solution background:
We have 3 x 7201 (NPE-G2) running c7200p-spservicesk9-mz.150-1.M5.bin.
The routers are arranged in a "triangle" with a link to each router utilising G0/2 + 3 on each router, IGP is OSPF with all routers + loopbacks being in OSPF Area 0. OSPF RID + MPLS RID is Lo0.
Routers are called ABC-CORE-1, CCC-CORE-1, CBC-CORE1.
During the "outage" the DLP session between ABC->CBC remains constant without issue, however the LDP sessions with CCC-CORE1 both drop stating the following:
ABC-CORE-1#show log
Apr 3 17:30:40.236: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.64.255.2:0 (1) is DOWN (Received error notification from peer: Holddown time expired)
Apr 3 17:30:44.180: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.64.255.2:0 (1) is UP
CCC-CORE-1#show log
.Apr 3 17:30:39: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.64.255.1:0 (1) is DOWN (Discovery Hello Hold Timer expired)
.Apr 3 17:30:43: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.64.255.1:0 (3) is UP
Neighbor output:
CCC-CORE-1#sh mpls ldp neigh 10.64.255.1 det
Peer LDP Ident: 10.64.255.1:0; Local LDP Ident 10.64.255.2:0
TCP connection: 10.64.255.1.646 - 10.64.255.2.36718
Password: not required, none, in use
State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 1191/1192; Downstream; Last TIB rev sent 130
Up time: 16:24:42; UID: 10; Peer Id 2;
LDP discovery sources:
GigabitEthernet0/2; Src IP addr: 10.64.0.1
holdtime: 15000 ms, hello interval: 5000 ms
Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
10.64.2.1 192.168.128.126 10.64.0.1 10.64.0.5
10.64.255.1 10.64.254.1
Peer holdtime: 180000 ms; KA interval: 60000 ms; Peer state: estab
Clients: Dir Adj Client
Capabilities Sent:
[Dynamic Announcement (0x0506)]
[Typed Wildcard (0x0970)]
Capabilities Received:
[Dynamic Announcement (0x0506)]
[Typed Wildcard (0x0970)]
ABC-CORE-1#show mpls ldp neigh 10.64.255.2 det
Peer LDP Ident: 10.64.255.2:0; Local LDP Ident 10.64.255.1:0
TCP connection: 10.64.255.2.36718 - 10.64.255.1.646
Password: not required, none, in use
State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 1193/1191; Downstream; Last TIB rev sent 130
Up time: 16:25:05; UID: 8; Peer Id 0;
LDP discovery sources:
GigabitEthernet0/2; Src IP addr: 10.64.0.2
holdtime: 15000 ms, hello interval: 5000 ms
Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
10.64.2.5 192.168.128.254 10.64.0.2 10.64.0.9
10.64.255.2 10.64.254.2
Peer holdtime: 180000 ms; KA interval: 60000 ms; Peer state: estab
Clients: Dir Adj Client
Capabilities Sent:
[Dynamic Announcement (0x0506)]
[Typed Wildcard (0x0970)]
Capabilities Received:
[Dynamic Announcement (0x0506)]
[Typed Wildcard (0x0970)]
I've just enabled MPLS IGP sync this morning aftere reading a few articles however I'm not convicnced that's going to make much difference, has anyone ever experieced this before?
Thanks,
Duncan.
For anyone that's interested I fixed this problem after some in depth troubleshooting.
Turns out the CCC router has CEF disabled.
I followed the through the following process:
Noticed flushes in the inteface counters -> researched SPD (selective packet discard) -> looked into CPU usage -> noticed IP Input process running 90%+, checked CEF with "show ip cef" showed a full adjancency table.
Checked the command "show cef interface"
Boom, "CEF Switching disabled" on every interface.
"no ip cef" "ip cef" , fixed.
For reference the running config did indeed show "ip cef" as entered and turned on.
Only thing I can think is when we upgraded from 12.4 to 15.0(1)M there was a glitch with CEF....
Very strange.
04-12-2012 05:44 AM
Tht's great..I have just started reading the mpls..your question will help me to enhance my skills..thanks for ur question and ans too..I really some help of u..pls reach me at ajaysartaj@gmail.com
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide