04-26-2017 01:54 AM
hi,
Would it be supported to buy the 3595 appliance and run ESXi on it so that we can use ISE as a VM?
Any limitations and would we be able to deploy the 3595 OVA on it?
REgards
Gert
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-26-2017 03:14 AM
Not clear what the value of doing that, but it is possible. However, you would then be treating the server as a generic appliance and may even require ISE-VM-K9 license on top of the appliance cost. You would also be reducing the overall capacity of mem/cpu resources which are now allocated to ESXi. If the goal is to run VM, then recommend purchase the UCS appliance of choice--and this could even be same platform as SNS--but with additional mem/cpu/disk as required.
In short, when deployed as an SNS-35x5 appliance, we only support direct installation of the ISE software, not foreign software--including hypervisors. Due to secure boot, that too may block install of the software.
/Craig
04-26-2017 03:14 AM
Not clear what the value of doing that, but it is possible. However, you would then be treating the server as a generic appliance and may even require ISE-VM-K9 license on top of the appliance cost. You would also be reducing the overall capacity of mem/cpu resources which are now allocated to ESXi. If the goal is to run VM, then recommend purchase the UCS appliance of choice--and this could even be same platform as SNS--but with additional mem/cpu/disk as required.
In short, when deployed as an SNS-35x5 appliance, we only support direct installation of the ISE software, not foreign software--including hypervisors. Due to secure boot, that too may block install of the software.
/Craig
05-09-2017 03:27 AM
Thanks Craig.
Main driver is the flexibility in upgrading. A rollback is superfast compared to appliances.
I assume we should calculate for some overhead of ESXi?
i.e:
HW MEM: 32GB
ESXI mem req: 0.5 GB
remaining: 31,5GB
In that case we would not be able to deploy an ova that requires 32GB.
05-09-2017 04:22 AM
3595 is based on 64GB, not 32GB. Allocation of 32 GB would correspond to 3495 specs. From a VM perspective, I don't think 512MB of mem is going to make a significant difference in performance profile, but using an actual SNS appliance as a VM host seems like an expensive option versus the purchase of comparable UCS platform. Now you also need to purchase and install hypervisor (where applicable), purchase ISE-VM-K9 license, and purchase of SASU to cover the VM appliance. There is technically no entitlement for VM because physical appliance or SmartNET purchased on physical appliance.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide