10-03-2019 08:24 AM
FMC is integrated with ISE. In FMC Access Control Policies, we can now see, under the tab SGT/ISE Attributes, Device Type, IP Location, SGT. We are using the Device types to block some devices like printers from reaching to the Internet.
However, is there a way to learn from ISE, the devices that have been successfully MABbed? Long story but: the customer setup is that they do MAB on all devices (printers, computers, etc. They don't do 1X or CWA). But on the switch port, they don't apply an Access-List pre-AuthC in. So, basically, traffic is allowed on the switch port. However, from the Edge Firewall, we would like to say that only devices that have successfully passed the MAB authentication are allowed to go out.
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-04-2019 06:02 AM
10-04-2019 06:02 AM
10-07-2019 01:38 PM
Thank Mike for your answer.
1. The customer is not doing TrustSec (my bad for misleading you when I mentioned that under the FMC, thanks to pxGrid, we were seeing attributes from ISE. The only attribute that populates through pxGrid is Device Type, since TrustSec hasn't been turned on).
2. Blocking at the firewall would not be the solution to stop non-authenticated endpoint from leaving the Network. We need to have a way to find out : is endpoint authenticated? [another frustrating point at that customer is that the entire network endpoints (IP Phones, printers, workstations) are all on the same 10.0.0.0/16 network (don't ask me why!!!)].
Remember the requirement of my original question:
A. Endpoints are all MAB, (not 1x)
B. The customer is not using pre-AuthC ACLs on switchport!!! So, the moment the command authentication open is added, the traffic starts going through the port. That traffic could find its way to the edge firewall and leave for the internet. Thus, it would be nice if NGFW could query ISE with "is device authenticated".
My personal opinion is that the customer needs to implement more features of 1X/MAB to fix this issue. The piece meal approach is not working here.
Thanks anyway. Consider this case close.
09-30-2022 09:15 AM
Where you able to find a solution by chance? I fail to see how FMC would not be able to see the session as the username of the session is the MAC address of the host.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide