05-01-2019 10:18 AM - edited 02-21-2020 11:05 AM
Hi All (especially Cisco TAC :0)
testing async authentication policy on C9.3K running Fuji 16.9.3 i've found that in certain circumtains (in my case always) port with attached dot1x enabled endpoint totally fails & stops authentication, & as well it removes mab from the interface template (& derived config of port). Have anybody ever faced this crap?
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-06-2019 12:55 AM
I have found the following bug ID in my mailbox:
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvj86626
Removing MAB from the interface is a consequence of the different bugs/issue related to this software with IBNS2.0.
Anyway, I would recommend opening a TAC Case as this is definitely not expected behaviour.
05-07-2019 11:41 PM
Hi Josef
i can see n workaround here with moving 'mab' on the interface config level. Seems it's not being removed with this approach, but we need to check as much scenarios as possible. Also can u drop here your ISE version?
tnx
07-13-2019 03:34 AM
05-01-2019 10:00 PM
Hi,
I have encountered exactly the same behaviour. According to Cisco it's a bug and should be fixed in 16.11.
Bear in mind that IBNS 2.0 in combination with Fuji Code is full of bugs especially if you want to use dynamic interface templates. Hopefully, it will be fixed in upcoming releases otherwise I would stick to IBNS 1.0 if it still fulfils your requirements.
05-02-2019 01:49 AM
Hi Josef
thanks for your input. could u pls may be add bug id as reference? I extremely need it to refer to while speaking to customer.
thanks in advance
05-06-2019 12:55 AM
I have found the following bug ID in my mailbox:
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvj86626
Removing MAB from the interface is a consequence of the different bugs/issue related to this software with IBNS2.0.
Anyway, I would recommend opening a TAC Case as this is definitely not expected behaviour.
05-07-2019 11:41 PM
Hi Josef
i can see n workaround here with moving 'mab' on the interface config level. Seems it's not being removed with this approach, but we need to check as much scenarios as possible. Also can u drop here your ISE version?
tnx
05-08-2019 01:38 PM
ISE 2.3 initially, then 2.4, patch 6
07-13-2019 03:34 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide