04-10-2018 06:16 AM
Hi,
we want to upgrade to 2.4 and wanted to test this on a non production ISE(unlicensed).
The URT fails at 75% of the "Clone config database" with "Failed (Import onto clones database failed)
Logs show ok here:
Job "CEPM"."SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_02" successfully completed at Tue Apr 10 14:41:44 2018 elapsed 0 00:02:09
but failed:
...
. . imported "CEPM"."UPSWORKFLOW_ROLES" 0 KB 0 rows
. . imported "CEPM"."WCS_SSO_TOKEN" 0 KB 0 rows
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/GRANT/OWNER_GRANT/OBJECT_GRANT
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/COMMENT
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/INDEX
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/FUNCTIONAL_INDEX/INDEX
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/CONSTRAINT
ORA-31684: Object type CONSTRAINT:"CEPM"."SYS_C0015154" already exists
ORA-31684: Object type CONSTRAINT:"CEPM"."SYS_C0015147" already exists
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/REF_CONSTRAINT
Job "CEPM"."SYS_IMPORT_SCHEMA_01" completed with 2 error(s) at Tue Apr 10 14:43:50 2018 elapsed 0 00:01:56
same but other log:
Tue Apr 10 14:43:17 CEST 2018 : . . imported "CEPM"."UPSWORKFLOW_ROLES" 0 KB 0 rows
Tue Apr 10 14:43:17 CEST 2018 : . . imported "CEPM"."WCS_SSO_TOKEN" 0 KB 0 rows
Tue Apr 10 14:43:17 CEST 2018 : Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/GRANT/OWNER_GRANT/OBJECT_GRANT
Tue Apr 10 14:43:17 CEST 2018 : Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/COMMENT
Tue Apr 10 14:43:17 CEST 2018 : Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/INDEX
Tue Apr 10 14:43:34 CEST 2018 : Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/FUNCTIONAL_INDEX/INDEX
Tue Apr 10 14:43:35 CEST 2018 : Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/CONSTRAINT
Tue Apr 10 14:43:43 CEST 2018 : ORA-31684: Object type CONSTRAINT:"CEPM"."SYS_C0015154" already exists
Tue Apr 10 14:43:43 CEST 2018 : ORA-31684: Object type CONSTRAINT:"CEPM"."SYS_C0015147" already exists
Tue Apr 10 14:43:43 CEST 2018 : Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/REF_CONSTRAINT
Tue Apr 10 14:43:53 CEST 2018 : Job "CEPM"."SYS_IMPORT_SCHEMA_01" completed with 2 error(s) at Tue Apr 10 14:43:50 2018 elapsed 0 00:01:56
and last:
===========================================================
Tue Apr 10 14:39:41 2018
TABLE SYS.WRP$_REPORTS: ADDED INTERVAL PARTITION SYS_P1008 (3022) VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2018-04-11 01:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
TABLE SYS.WRP$_REPORTS_DETAILS: ADDED INTERVAL PARTITION SYS_P1009 (3022) VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2018-04-11 01:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
TABLE SYS.WRP$_REPORTS_TIME_BANDS: ADDED INTERVAL PARTITION SYS_P1012 (3021) VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2018-04-10 01:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
Tue Apr 10 14:41:53 2018
DM00 started with pid=50, OS id=27934, job CEPM.SYS_IMPORT_SCHEMA_01
Tue Apr 10 14:41:56 2018
DW00 started with pid=51, OS id=27966, wid=1, job CEPM.SYS_IMPORT_SCHEMA_01
Tue Apr 10 14:42:18 2018
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 2
Private strand flush not complete
Current log# 1 seq# 1 mem# 0: /opt/oracle/base/oradata/cpm11/redo01.log
Tue Apr 10 14:42:21 2018
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 2 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 2 seq# 2 mem# 0: /opt/oracle/base/oradata/cpm11/redo02.log
Tue Apr 10 14:42:54 2018
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 3 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 3 seq# 3 mem# 0: /opt/oracle/base/oradata/cpm11/redo03.log
Tue Apr 10 14:43:19 2018
The value (159) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (159) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
Tue Apr 10 14:43:34 2018
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
The value (167) of MAXTRANS parameter ignored.
Tue Apr 10 14:43:42 2018
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 4
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 3 seq# 3 mem# 0: /opt/oracle/base/oradata/cpm11/redo03.log
Tue Apr 10 14:43:48 2018
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 4 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 1 seq# 4 mem# 0: /opt/oracle/base/oradata/cpm11/redo01.log
Tue Apr 10 14:43:54 2018
Shutting down instance (immediate)
Stopping background process SMCO
Shutting down instance: further logons disabled
Stopping background process CJQ0
Stopping background process MMNL
Stopping background process MMON
License high water mark = 43
Tue Apr 10 14:43:57 2018
All dispatchers and shared servers shutdown
ALTER DATABASE CLOSE NORMAL
Tue Apr 10 14:43:58 2018
Stopping Emon pool
Tue Apr 10 14:43:58 2018
SMON: disabling tx recovery
Stopping Emon pool
Tue Apr 10 14:43:58 2018
SMON: disabling cache recovery
Shutting down archive processes
Archiving is disabled
Tue Apr 10 14:43:58 2018
Thread 1 closed at log sequence 4
Successful close of redo thread 1
Completed: ALTER DATABASE CLOSE NORMAL
ALTER DATABASE DISMOUNT
Shutting down archive processes
Archiving is disabled
Completed: ALTER DATABASE DISMOUNT
Tue Apr 10 14:43:59 2018
ARCH: Archival disabled due to shutdown: 1089
Shutting down archive processes
Archiving is disabled
ARCH: Archival disabled due to shutdown: 1089
Shutting down archive processes
Archiving is disabled
Tue Apr 10 14:44:01 2018
Stopping background process VKTM
Tue Apr 10 14:44:10 2018
Instance shutdown complete
hope someone can help troubleshooting.
BR!
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-10-2018 06:22 AM
You should be working through the TAC to help you troubleshoot and identify potential issues so proper defects can be logged if needed
04-10-2018 06:22 AM
You should be working through the TAC to help you troubleshoot and identify potential issues so proper defects can be logged if needed
04-16-2018 11:42 AM
As the ISE I took for testing the upgrade isn't productive, I upgraded it without the success of the URT.
The upgrade completed successfull without any issue and ISE 2.4 is great on the first glance.
01-07-2021 06:54 AM
You will face the same problem if you upgrade from 2.1 to 2.4 and from 2.4 to 2.7 ,
is related to the hands-off on the ORACLE db under the hood.
It seems like some internal user ( or some listener ) still doing some sort of query.
The solution is to run an " application stop ise " followed by " application start ise"
this will unlock the database and let you continue with URT .
let me know if is work for you too.
I tried this trick with to 2 different deployment and other 2 upgrade process .
01-07-2021 08:31 AM
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvf83249/?referring_site=ss&dtid=osscdc000283
M.
01-07-2021 10:29 AM - edited 01-07-2021 12:38 PM
unfortunatly the bug still present after patch 8 of ise 2.4 , and proceed with the upgrade (in my case) without stopping the ise application caused the db corruption ,and eventually led to an unstable state of the appliance .
But hey , maybe someone got more lucky than me , just sharing my experience.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide