10-18-2018 08:33 AM
Disclaimer: I've seen a few posts on this but nothing conclusive or that seems to address this specific issue.
A customer has been running ISE for many years and initially deployed the "Large" OVA (SNS-3595 equivalent). No resource allocations were modified post-installation. After upgrading to ISE 2.4, the customer shows to be out of compliance and needs the "Large" license despite the fact that the VMs are 8 vCPU and 64 GB of RAM.
Interestingly, one VM was built new from the 2.4 "Large" OVA and it doesn't show the error/problem. They may rebuild each VM using this OVA, but it that process is a huge pain just to get around this error.
Has anyone seen anything specific to upgraded VM's vs. new and 2.4 Large license warnings?
Thank you,
Brian
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-18-2018 09:03 AM
Deffinitely have them confirm vCPU then. If a 2.4 3595 ova is deplyoed today, then it will have 16 vcpu, but if they upgraded a prior ova then it's likely that the cpu count is off. They will have to power the VM's down to adjust the count.
You can check this within ISE from the reporting portal. This is an example of a 2.4 VM with only 8 vcpu, UCS_Large which is wrong.
10-18-2018 08:45 AM
10-18-2018 08:55 AM
Thanks, Damien. I saw that bug and shared with the customer but it didn't seem to fit (especially since he's already patched to 4). I'll check again on the vCPU sockets vs cores and hyper-threading but since the VM's were initially deployed from Cisco OVA's I figured those details would be covered.
Per my comment about upgraded nodes vs newly-built nodes, I'm suspecting some other bug might be at play.
I'll keep digging. Thank you.
10-18-2018 09:03 AM
Deffinitely have them confirm vCPU then. If a 2.4 3595 ova is deplyoed today, then it will have 16 vcpu, but if they upgraded a prior ova then it's likely that the cpu count is off. They will have to power the VM's down to adjust the count.
You can check this within ISE from the reporting portal. This is an example of a 2.4 VM with only 8 vcpu, UCS_Large which is wrong.
10-21-2018 01:11 AM - edited 10-21-2018 01:12 AM
In case of smart licensing, customers might continue seeing Out Of Compliance (OOC) messages if the deployment was OOC for 45 days in the past out of the last 60 days. The messages will go away afterwards.
CSCvk59357
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide