cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1002
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

ISE 2.4/P1 is not matching Radius Attributes anymore

alex.fritzsche
Level 4
Level 4

Our fresh ISE 2.4 with Patch 1 installed is not identifying the Radius attributes correctly anymore.

Oberving the Authentications coming from a foreign WLC for WPA2/802.1X Guest Wlan show

"NAS Port Type" 19 instead of "Wireless - IEEE 802.11"

and

"Service Type" 2 instead of "Framed"

--> in Live Logs "Auth Method" shows "2"...


--> this leads ISE is not identifying the smart condition "Wireless_802.1X" anymore!!

Authentication is enabled via PEAP and works, but Policy Set will not be considered by ISE if i let Wireless_802.1X as condition set.

is this a bug?

Cisco_comm.PNG

Can someone clarify the WLAN-configuration and differences for the WLC's is correct as follows (rest is standard) as i think there could be the problem:

Security > AAA Servers > AAA Authentication enabled for WLAN on foreign WLC and also on the Anchor WLC? Or should it be disabled on Anchor?

Security > AAA Servers > AAA Accounting for WLAN only enabled on foreign WLC with Interim Update Set to 0 (Clients are not roaming here, only one foreign WLC present) and Accounting for WLAN not enabled on Anchor WLC

Advanced > Radius Client Profiling enabled on foreign WLC only

Advanced > DHCP Addr.Assignment set to required on both foreign WLC and Anchor WLC (Achor does DHCP)

Session timout is enabled for the WLAN on both WLCs to 43200secs

Security > Layer 2> Authentication Key Management > FT 802.1X is enabled on foreign WLC  but not Anchor...but i don't know what that means really.

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

If not working with preconfigured condition after patch install, but working with identical custom condition, then recommend open TAC case.

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

alex.fritzsche
Level 4
Level 4

EDIT:

If I build an own Wireless_802.1X condition (Radius NAS-Port-Type = Wireless - IEEE 802.11 and Radius Service-Type = Framed) it works...

So why is ISE not identifiying its own built-in conditions correctly??

If not working with preconfigured condition after patch install, but working with identical custom condition, then recommend open TAC case.