- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-24-2018 10:23 AM
Hi team,
I need to understand if there are some limitations/differences on ISE for our Meraki vs traditional Wireless, especially for Device Posture. I found the How To guide which is great but won’t go into differences/limitations details.
Could you please provide more details if there are some limitations/differences on ISE for our Meraki vs traditional Wireless?
Many thanks in advance!
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-24-2018 10:28 AM
Per that document meraki supports everything except for inline tagging for SGT Trustsec
It supports redirection for guest, byod, posture, its complete support of posture. Either it works or it doesn’t
Meraki & traditional are the same support
HTH

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-24-2018 10:28 AM
Per that document meraki supports everything except for inline tagging for SGT Trustsec
It supports redirection for guest, byod, posture, its complete support of posture. Either it works or it doesn’t
Meraki & traditional are the same support
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-10-2019 07:41 AM - edited 07-10-2019 07:42 AM
Is this still valid ?
