11-07-2018 06:12 AM
my ise and stealthwatch are connected via pxgrid. i followed every step of the " Deploying Cisco Stealthwatch 6.10.2 with Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) 2.4.0.375 using Cisco Platform Exchange Grid (pxGrid)" Guide from John Eppich and used the ISE internal CA.
I had setup these configuration by below document, But I can't quarantine these Host. It will show below error message.
My ISE and Stealthwatch are connected as you can see in the screenshots right here:
11-07-2018 11:21 AM
11-07-2018 12:42 PM
11-07-2018 01:45 PM
As Tim mentioned the Pxgrid configuration seems Ok.
However from the screenshot I see that the status for the host in stealthwatch UI shows inactive. Can you clear the authentication session on the switch or do a shut/no shut on the switchport. It has to show active. Also make sure you are generating the right traffic based on security events configured if you are capturing a policy violation. Make sure you also see the sessions in ISE.
-Krishnan
11-07-2018 06:08 PM
Hi Sir:
Refers to your description. I have below issue.
1.If ISE want to block the host. It must control the switch. It will send the ACL to the switch by dACL. Right ?
2.If ISE want to control the switch. What kind the function it must setup in the switch ?
AAA/EAP/802.1x......
3.In my lab. I just implement the vm host of ISE / Stealthwatch / FMC / FDM / Kali / Win 7. I didn't implement switch Cisco. So it can't send the dACL to Stealthwatch from ISE and block the kali ?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide