02-15-2007 11:46 AM
I'm trying to use RME compliance check but it doesn't seem to work correctly.
If I define a template like this
Name: Global SubMode: Yes isPrerequisite: No
Ordered : No Prerequisite-Commandset : none Parent: none
IP SLA 6
+ frequency 500
All my devices are always compliant even when it is not the case.
If I change frequency 500 with 600 for example, they are still all compliant.
It is like this template doesn't do anything.
It does work if I test on sub interface like Fe0 for example.
How can I test compliance for sub-commands other than interfaces?
Thanks
02-15-2007 12:04 PM
This is probably because you don't have the "ip sla 6" operation configured. You could try doing this using two commandlets:
Name: SLA6 SubMode: No isPrerequisite: No
Ordered : No Prerequisite-Commandset : none Parent: none
+ ip sla 6
Name: SLA6Freq SubMode: Yes isPrerequisite: No
Ordered : No Prerequisite-Commandset : none Parent: none
ip sla 6
+ frequency 500
02-15-2007 02:50 PM
Unfortunately this doesn't work either.
It does detect the ones missing the IP SLA 6 command but frequency is still being missed.
I've tried many different ways but the routers always come back as compliant.
I've also tried sub-mode test with "crypto ipsec client ezvpn" and the same thing happens.
02-15-2007 03:29 PM
I've just tried the example RME template called "TemplateExample2"
Name: parent SubMode: Yes isPrerequisite: No
Ordered : No Prerequisite-Commandset : none Parent: none
policy-map V3PN-teleworker
# No commands
Name: child SubMode: Yes isPrerequisite: No
Ordered : No Prerequisite-Commandset : none Parent: parent
class VOICE
+ priority 64
I configured the router with "priority 62"
then ran the compliance test.
And the router config came back as compliant again.
02-22-2007 05:13 PM
TAC has been able to reproduce the problem and new DDTS has been filed ( CSCsh87911 )
Fix should be in LMS 3.0 scheduled to be released in May.
02-22-2007 05:41 PM
Hi
Is yr news confirmed that LMS 3.0 is schedule to released in May?
I wish LMS can be more stable not memory intensive.
I also wish that DFM module can act intelligently like other products such as HP OV NNM, CA eHealth when tackle the fault and events.
All Hail..King Of The Network!! :D
Cheers!
02-22-2007 05:51 PM
That's what the TAC engineer said.
Now that's no confirmation at all.
I have no idea where she got the info from.
For me , it just confirm that they are going to release LMS 3.0 sometime this year.
And I still expect it to be a big pile of non-working crap with just few useful features.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide