cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
877
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

ACL instead of same-security-traffic permit inter-interface

090002aaa
Level 1
Level 1

Morning. Engineers

I hope you can help me to figure out why is not working using ACL.

Model:                    ASA 5555-X

Version:                  9.2(2)4 

Multiple Context:    Yes

Network1      10.100.0.0/24 (DMZ1 on physical subinterface)         security-level 50

Network2      10.100.1.0/24 (DMZ2 on portchannel subinterface)   security-level 50

Network3      10.100.2.0/30 (Routing to my LAN)                            security-level 50

LAN              192.168.200.0/24

I need Network2 only communicates with 192.168.200.0/24 through 10.100.2.0/30 with ACL's.

Using the command "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" there is no problem it works but no security, because Network1 can communicate with Network2/3 and my LAN.

I was trying ACL in but no success.

access-list ROUTING extended permit ip 10.100.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0

access-group ROUTING in interface Network3

packet-tracer input Network2 tcp 10.100.1.10 16789 192.168.200.10 80 detailed

It says communications was dropped because of ACL (I think global is deny any any).

Thanks for your time.

 

 

 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi,

yes, You need 'same security' command to allow the communication between same security-level interface. It is mendatory. However you could restrict commnunication between subnet on these interfaces with the help of Access-list.

Hope it answers your query.

Regards,

Akshay Rastogi

Remember to rate helpful posts.

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Rishabh Seth
Level 7
Level 7

Hi,

You would require this command to permit the traffic between interface of same security level.

But along with this command you can create ACLs to control traffic based on your security requirements.

Thanks,

Rishabh Seth

PS: Rate if it helps and mark answer as correct if it resolves your issue.

Hi, Rishabh

You mean that I need to use both that command (same-security-traffic permit inter-interface) and ACL?

Is there any way only to use ACL to communicate those networks?

Regards

Hi,

yes, You need 'same security' command to allow the communication between same security-level interface. It is mendatory. However you could restrict commnunication between subnet on these interfaces with the help of Access-list.

Hope it answers your query.

Regards,

Akshay Rastogi

Remember to rate helpful posts.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card