cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
455
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies

arp permit-nonconnected Not Working

paperangel220
Level 1
Level 1

I have a ASA 5506-X version 9.8(2). The ASA has two interfaces: g1/1 (outside, ip: 209.165.0.2/30), and g1/3 (inside, ip: 209.165.0.5/30).

g1/1 is connected to a 881-W router (Router-A), whose ip is 209.165.0.1/30. Router-A's internal interface is 192.168.0.1/24.

g1/3 is connected to a 2821 router (Router-B), whose ip is 209.165.0.6/30. Router-B's internal interface is 10.0.0.1/24.

This is what the topology looks like: (Note that I have an actual physical lab, I just diagrammed it in Packet Tracer so that it's easier to visualize. Also the model numbers on the Packet Tracer diagram do not correspond with the actual physical models)

paperangel220_0-1708457450484.png

 

Below are my additional configurations:

881-W's routes:

ip route 209.165.0.4 255.255.255.252 vlan 2     <------------ (I would like to test if a directly connected route can result in a successful ping. If I change this to a next hop route (ip route 209.165.0.4 255.255.255.252 209.165.0.2), ping is successful. But as of now, ping is unsuccessful if I use the directly connected route.)

ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 209.165.0.2

 

2821's routes:

ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 209.165.0.5

ip route 209.165.0.0 255.255.255.252 209.165.0.5

 

ASA's routes and ACL:

route outside 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 209.165.0.1

route inside 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 209.165.0.6

access-list PERMIT extended permit ip any any

access-group PERMIT in interface outside

access-group PERMIT in interface inside

access-group PERMIT out interface outside

access-group PERMIT out interface inside

 

I added arp permit-nonconnected on the ASA, but pinging from 192.168.0.1 to 10.0.0.1 does not work. Why?

debug arp on ASA outputs:

arp-in: request at outside from 209.165.0.1 588d.09a4.f3cc for 10.0.0.1 0000.0000.0000 having smac 588d.09a4.f3cc dmac ffff.ffff.ffff
arp-set: added arp outside 209.165.0.1 588d.09a4.f3cc and updating NPs at 19:52:01.599

 

Shouldn't it work even if the source (209.165.0.1) and destination address (10.0.0.1) of the ARP packet are in different subnets, since I configured arp permit-nonconnected?

 

Thanks for the help!

6 Replies 6

To ping 

1-You need two static route in ASA 

2-You need one static route in each router 

MHM

 

I already had these routes configured:

881-W's routes:

ip route 209.165.0.4 255.255.255.252 vlan 2     

ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 209.165.0.2

 

2821's routes:

ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 209.165.0.5

ip route 209.165.0.0 255.255.255.252 209.165.0.5

 

ASA's routes and ACL:

route outside 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 209.165.0.1

route inside 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 209.165.0.6

 

But pinging doesn't work. Are these the necessary routes or am I mistaken? Thanks!

From any pc traceroute to other one 

Share the reuslt here 

MHM

paperangel220_1-1708466334742.png

 

 

The traffic stop in router

Use in both router static route but use egress interface not next-hop

MHM

I changed the routes to use egress interface. Ping is still unsuccessful:

881-W router:
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan2
ip route 209.165.0.4 255.255.255.252 Vlan2

2821 router:
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet0/0
ip route 209.165.0.0 255.255.255.252 GigabitEthernet0/0

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card