05-31-2017 11:52 PM - edited 03-12-2019 02:27 AM
Hey guys, here's a question.
Last year, we depolyed 2 ASAs, and they are configured as failover mode.
Use these commands:
failover interface ip lan_failover 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.1.2
failover interface ip stateful_failover 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.2.2
interface Port-channel2
lacp max-bundle 8
nameif outside
security-level 50
ip address 10.30.14.251 255.255.248.0 standby 10.30.14.252
But this week, we configured 2 new ASAs, still in failover mode, and these 4 ASAs are in the same subnet, we use the same configure, only different is the outside interface.
failover interface ip lan_failover 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.1.2
failover interface ip stateful_failover 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.2.2
interface Port-channel2
lacp max-bundle 8
nameif outside
security-level 50
ip address 10.30.14.253 255.255.248.0 standby 10.30.14.254
So, in my opion, the failover link is just connect to each other, it will not effect the whole network, but when we capture the packet in broadcast domain, we found some 192.168.x.x packets, so is it OK? Thx!~~~
06-01-2017 01:10 AM
How are your lan_failover and stateful_failover interfaces connected? i.e. is it a direct cable or via an intermediate switch?
Generally we would not expect to see the ASA flood out any interface except the connected ones for a given subnet.
06-01-2017 08:45 PM
Thanks for reply. Direct cable. 1st ASA's G0/6 connect to 2nd ASA's G0/6.
1st ASA's G0/7 connect to 2nd ASA's G0/7.
06-01-2017 08:50 PM
That's odd.
Have you conirmed that the source MAC address for the 192.168.x.x traffic is an ASA interface?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide