cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
475
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

ASA 5525 FAILOVER PROBLEMS

ml12129
Level 1
Level 1

Hey guys, here's a question.

Last year, we depolyed 2 ASAs, and they are configured as failover mode. 

Use these commands:

  failover interface ip lan_failover 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.1.2
  failover interface ip stateful_failover 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.2.2

  interface Port-channel2
  lacp max-bundle 8
  nameif outside
  security-level 50
  ip address 10.30.14.251 255.255.248.0 standby 10.30.14.252

But this week, we configured 2 new ASAs, still in failover mode, and these 4 ASAs are in the same subnet, we use the same configure, only different is the outside interface.

  failover interface ip lan_failover 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.1.2
  failover interface ip stateful_failover 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.2.2

  interface Port-channel2
  lacp max-bundle 8
  nameif outside
  security-level 50
  ip address 10.30.14.253 255.255.248.0 standby 10.30.14.254

So, in my opion,  the failover link is just connect to each other, it will not effect the whole network, but when we capture the packet in broadcast domain, we found some 192.168.x.x packets, so is it OK?   Thx!~~~

3 Replies 3

Marvin Rhoads
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

How are your lan_failover and stateful_failover interfaces connected? i.e. is it a direct cable or via an intermediate switch?

Generally we would not expect to see the ASA flood out any interface except the connected ones for a given subnet.

Thanks for reply. Direct cable. 1st ASA's G0/6 connect to 2nd ASA's G0/6.    

1st ASA's G0/7 connect to 2nd ASA's G0/7.    

That's odd.

Have you conirmed that the source MAC address for the 192.168.x.x traffic is an ASA interface?

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card