11-30-2011 02:27 AM - edited 03-11-2019 02:57 PM
Hi,
I have this error when I try to migrate a policy NAT from 8.2 to 8.4:
Addresses overlap with existing localpool range
ERROR: NAT Policy is not downloaded
The original 8.2 configuration works and I created a static NAT for an INSIDE_HOST (with EXT_HOST) when it's contacted from IPSEC client (VPN_POOL).
nat (inside) 0 access-list no-nat
access-list no-nat remark VPNCLIENT
! this prevent NAT exemption for the host
access-list no-nat extended deny ip host INSIDE_HOST VPN_POOL
! NAT exemption for vpn client
access-list no-nat extended permit ip INSIDE_LAN VPN_POOL
access-list POLICY-NAT extended permit ip host INSIDE_HOST VPN_POOL
static (inside,outside) EXT_HOST access-list POLICY-NAT dns
Now the migration tool didn't convert it and generated the same error.
I wrote this nat entry:
nat (inside,outside) source static INSIDE_HOST EXT_HOST destination static VPN_POOL VPN _POOL
But another time, the error is the same.
Any ideas ?
Regards,
Iarno
11-30-2011 02:52 AM
nat (inside,outside) source static INSIDE_HOST EXT_HOST destination static VPN_POOL VPN _POOL
This should be
nat (inside,outside) source static INSIDE_HOST INSIDE_HOST destination static VPN_POOL VPN _POOL
Also object groups should be in place -
Object network INSIDE_HOST
object network VPN _POOL
Thanks
Ajay
11-30-2011 03:16 AM
Hi Ajay,
the command :
nat (inside,outside) source static INSIDE_HOST INSIDE_HOST destination static VPN_POOL VPN _POOL
is great for NAT excemption, but whtt about policy NAT :
access-list POLICY-NAT extended permit ip host INSIDE_HOST VPN_POOL
static (inside,outside) EXT_HOST access-list POLICY-NAT dns
Iarno
11-30-2011 03:31 AM
Ahh i got you now should be-
nat (inside,outside) source dynamic INSIDE_HOST EXT_HOST destination static VPN_POOL VPN_POOL
Thanks
Ajay
11-30-2011 03:57 AM
Hi,
I tried but the problem is the same and I not sure that this is a static NAT. VPN_POOL have to access to EXT_HOST services (ex. RDP). Anyway this happens:
ip local pool VPN 1.1.1.1-1.1.1.15
object network VPN_POOL
subnet 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.240
object network INSIDE_HOST
host 10.10.10.10
object network EXT_HOST
host 11.11.11.11
ciscoasa(config)# nat (inside,outside) source dynamic INSIDE_HOST EXT_HOST destination static VPN_POOL VPN_POOL
Addresses overlap with existing localpool range
ERROR: NAT Policy is not downloaded
11-30-2011 04:53 AM
Please clarify this-
VPN_POOL have to access to EXT_HOST services (ex. RDP). Anyway this happens:
Inside host are trying to access VPN pool memeber ?
VPN Pool memebers are trying to access host on internet ? ex 11.11.11.11
or You want to setup this IP for VPN pool member to access host on internet ?
When there is one to one mapping then only static keyword is used .
Also post your configuration.
Thanks
Ajay
11-30-2011 06:04 AM
Hi,
thank for replay. The scenario is this:
Some clients are accessing via vpnclient IPSEC to ASA. They use a public DNS to resolves server's name. The IP address resolved is encrypted via IPSEC. With ASA 8.2 I used policy NAT as posted to mapping static this IP address to real IP address of the server.
In my example object configurations are:
VPN_POOL IP. Address assign to client IPSEC
INSIDE_HOST. Real IP address of server
EXT_HOST. Mapped ip address (client vpn trying to access to this IP when they connect)
Now the question is: Is it possibile manage that with 8.3 or 8.4 ?
Thanks
Iarno
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide