07-17-2014 08:59 PM - edited 03-11-2019 09:29 PM
Hello,
I am planning to setup Active/Standby for ASA. However, I am not sure is it those active/standby support port-channel setup? And any example and items need to take care?
Which I would like to increase to bandwidth from LAN to WAN with ideal throughput is higher than single physical interface.
Thanks!
07-18-2014 01:07 AM
Hi,
Yes you can do it. But follow the method of doing it as suggested in the document.
If you use the ASA in an Active/Standby failover deployment, then you need to create separate EtherChannels on the switches in the VSS, one for each ASA (see Figure 12-1). On each ASA, a single EtherChannel connects to both switches. Even if you could group all switch interfaces into a single EtherChannel connecting to both ASAs (in this case, the EtherChannel will not be established because of the separate ASA system IDs), a single EtherChannel would not be desirable because you do not want traffic sent to the standby ASA.
Regards
Karthik
07-18-2014 03:30 AM
Hi,
Thanks. How about if my connection to WAN direction is just a single CISCO router which have switch modules attached?
Can I using the diagram idea to create to create two port-channel group at CISCO router?
Thanks!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide